Jump to content

User talk:142.167.92.94

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CJCurrie (talk | contribs) at 03:21, 1 May 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

you have edited a quotation.

It is not possible to go back in time and change someones words according to the current physics of this world.

I edited my own statement (expanded a sentence without changing its meaning) and I did it before anyone else had time to reply. Which is allowed by Wikipedia's rules. 142.167.92.94 (talk) 11:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


No, you edited direct quotations. What, are you a CPC member, just lie in the face of facts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.239.26.139 (talk) 19:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You ah=have been reverted yet again for breaking Wikipedia rules. I am not a member of anything other. You, obviously, want to use Wikipedia as a grand stand for your personal opinions. And podium POV pushing is not acceptable on an encyclopedia project whose has a rule of neutrality. 142.167.92.94 (talk) 20:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the user 142.167.92.94 (talk) seems to have the need to lie in the face of the facts and use wikipedia for it's personal opinions. He/she probably have serious personal issues and/or is mentaly chalenged. A discusion with this user is nothing but a waste of time. (Carnotaurus044) —Preceding undated comment added 22:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

So speaks the POV pusher from Mexico who hasn't bothered to read WP:LEAD and continues to edit based on his personal opinion. Look at toerh pages where there is constant turmoil over infobox entries. The fine details are in the box and the lead sentence remains neitral. As per Wikipedia's rules. 142.167.92.94 (talk) 22:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no matter from where im from, i'm way better writting than you. Probably you have the best intentions in this cruel world but you're wrong, you aren't editing a bob dylan or an arcade fire page, it's an epic fault call deftones rock, if there is a general term that fits with them, that is heavy metal, like metalica or pantera, lets do this: change deftones genre from alternative metal to heavy metal (a general term) so neither you or i "won", and let's end with this childish feud ok? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carnotaurus044 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.d. im waiting your answer, i want disscus this like adults, well because at least i'm one Carnotaurus044 (talk)

You can't copy and paste a warning you've received and included another editor's signature. I have Wikipedia policy behind me. I cannot edit the pages you are violating WP:OWN on anymore. I have provided the policy links for you to read to help you understand where your edits are in error. Please read them before you wind up blocked. 142.167.92.94 (talk) 23:37, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

im pretty sure about that "other" editor is your sockpupet, so, why not send your own advert to you? actually, you are in far more risk of being blocked than myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carnotaurus044 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Three-revert rule

I've just realized that you're in violation of the three-revert rule on the Jack Layton. It's possible that you were not previously familiar with this rule; however, I will request that you follow it now. CJCurrie (talk) 03:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:142.167.92.94&oldid=426829383"