This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MuZebot(talk | contribs) at 02:08, 8 May 2011(WP:VG assessment, replaced: {{WikiProject Video games}} → {{WikiProject Video games|class=Start|importance=Low}} using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:08, 8 May 2011 by MuZebot(talk | contribs)(WP:VG assessment, replaced: {{WikiProject Video games}} → {{WikiProject Video games|class=Start|importance=Low}} using AWB)
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Article needs mainstream references. Personally I would think the author is more significant than one of his series. Problem is, Wikipedians - esp. the draconic delete delete delete types, are very enamoured of print media and "mainstream" references. The man and his works inhabit a purely internet/geek domain which won't show up much in the NY Times or academic research printed books. Pär Larsson (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
At the very least, the character information needs to go; all that stuff is completely irrelevant to the article at hand and is a rather poor duplication of what is already in other character articles. –MuZemike22:08, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
