Jump to content

User talk:200.55.213.30

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by E2eamon (talk | contribs) at 19:01, 6 June 2011 (Level 2 warning re. vandalism on International School Nido de Aguilas (GLOO)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.


Administrator is claimed to be rarce@nido.cl and any vandalism should be reported to that person.


Warnings

This user has been repeatedly warned against vandalism and blanking. The user often blanks this discussion page or removes specific comments which makes it harder to keep track of the number of times the user has been warned and blocked. Nevertheless, with the latest block in place, I am hoping that the user has cooled down enough to give up the vandalism. We can hope. --Yamla 19:48, September 8, 2005 (UTC)

You hope WAYYYYYY too much. --User:200.55.213.30, 10:02, September 12, 2005 (unsigned comment)

I don't know where to put this, but I(not the guy vandalizing) would like to note that this is a high school's IP address, in case anyone didn't know.

I've added that information to the top of the page. Could you please let us know which high school, along with the contact information for the school administer, so that appropriate disciplinary actions can be taken against the vandals at that school? If you personally would like to be unblocked, set yourself up with an account and leave a message on my talk page. Note that with vandals operating from this IP address, your account may occasionally be blocked as a side-effect. It won't be anything personal, though. --Yamla 16:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The school is called Nido de Aguilas and I'm not sure who's in charge of the computers, but one of the people in charge is rarce@nido.cl

Hello. I know who vandalized the Ricardo Lagos and the Michelle Bachelet and the Shakira and the Ivan Zamorano and the Bread and the Thomas Hobbes and Edgar Allan Poe articles, if anyone would like to take corrective measures. It was a student at Nido de Aguilas (the high school) called JAMES BEASLEY, 9th grade, email: jbeasley100@gmail.com, I believe. I hope this proves helpful. Long live Wikipedia! Long live the workers! Long live raptor Jesus! Long live all the Jesi,!!!!!!! End of transmission.

April 2005

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!.

Pavel Vozenilek 18:56, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

August 2005

Hi, your changes on the article mentioned above are considered to be vandalism. Repeated vandalism on Wikipedia will result in a ban from further editing.--BaronLarf 16:53, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

{{Block}}

You have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against vandalism. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.

Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.

--BaronLarf 17:01, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

September 2005

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.--Yamla 22:42, September 6, 2005 (UTC)


Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- GraemeL (talk) 16:58, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the article [[]]. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- GraemeL (talk) 17:00, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.. Thryduulf 17:01, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 24 hours

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. - jredmond 17:12, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Attack on own user's talk page

I don't know if this counts as vandalism, but the user added over four megabytes of garbage to the user's own discussion page. This causes problems with wikipedia, let alone the fact that Wikipedia's bandwidth is being used up for garbage. As the user has been warned numerous times and blocked several times, I am requesting an additional block.

So I should get banned for vandalizing my own page. Cool. DO you think it is cool? Cause I do! I think that I should get completely banned. Do you think so? Cause I do. I like waffles. Do you like waffles. Cause I do. I think wikipedia is misinformation. do you think so? Cause I do. --Unsigned comment from User:200.55.213.30, 10:00, September 12, 2005. I snipped several megabytes of vandalism. --Yamla 17:07, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for two weeks from editing Wikipedia. Despite multiple warnings to cease your vandalism, you chose to ignore them. Text dumping on Wikipedia - regardless in which namespace it is done - is thoroughly unappreciated here. So is repeated insertion of inflammatory material to articles.

Once the block expires, you are free to make constructive edits to the encyclopedia. Should you choose to continue your previous inappropriate editing behaviour, you will be blocked much longer. Thanks for your understanding. --HappyCamper 17:43, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Theoretically for how much time can i get banned?--Unsigned comment from User:200.55.213.30, 13:04, September 13, 2005.

We can make indefinite blocks, should the situation warrant. - jredmond 17:15, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

October 2005

This message is regarding the article Wario. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [ contribsblockblock log ] -- ≈ jossi fresco ≈ 15:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the article Iannis Xenakis. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia that people have worked hard to create. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [ contribsblockblock log ] -- GraemeL (talk) 15:33, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ashenai (talk) 11:58, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t@ 16:03, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BLOCKED for ONE WEEK!

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. FireFox 16:09, 25 October 2005 (UTC) [reply]

Donde Estan Los Ladrones

  • I have told you repeatedly that if this track is a hidden track, you must specify which pressing it's on. It's definitely not on the American version, as I know multiple people who have the album, and not one reports that track to be on it. Danny Lilithborne 07:56, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Anonymous user at 200.55.213.30, why do you bother with the vandalism? You waste your own time, you waste our time, and everything gets reverted anyway. Half the time, someone has blocked you from editing. Do you really have nothing better to do with your life? --Yamla 17:09, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nay, I say unto thou, nay. 200.55.213.30 15:10, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

10 November 2005 vandalism warning

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ➨ REDVERS 16:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page Edgar Allan Poe. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JoanneB 16:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Continued vandalism

You have been warned countless times about vandalism. You have been blocked repeatedly. You have promised to continue vandalising pages. It seems that you have no intention of ever performing any legitimate edits. For this reason, I have requested another block. Should you perform any more acts of vandalism, I will request a permanent block. Please stop. --Yamla 16:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, whatever, I'll stop. Chill. -- unsigned comment from 200.55.213.30 09:00, 15 November 2005 (MST)

You don't even say thank you, Yamla. -- unsigned comment from 200.55.213.30 13:05, 16 November 2005 (MST)
You didn't stop vandalising articles. Why should I thank you for not stopping vandalising? --Yamla 16:23, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I did, liar.

Here are some of the instances of vandalism perpetrated by you since you stated you'd stop vandalising:

How does this count as stopping, and why does this continual vandalism warrant a thank you from me? --Yamla 16:50, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

20 Feb 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to The Sure Thing. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Where (talk) 15:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yo no se de lo que usted esta hablando. Comuniquese en español por favor.

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sango123 (talk) 15:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. This block is for a full month as you have previously been blocked multiple times. If you persist in vandalising the Wikipedia, we can block you permanently. --Yamla 15:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Regarding the recent block

Dear Yamla, I have been enraged beyond what is healthy for your life due to ther lastest block against me. I was never told of any block, and I believe it is Wikipedia policy to announce blocks on user's talk pages. As soon as I'm unblock, I will request that you be removed from your post as admin. With the minimum necessary amount of respect, --Ricardo Lagos

I'm sorry you feel it necessary to threaten my life. However, given that you have been warned more than twenty times to stop vandalising articles. You have previously promised to stop, only to immediately continue vandalising. You have implied that you have no intention of stopping your vandalism. And you were indeed told about the block. The block notice is immediately above your most recent comment. Now, it is quite possible there is some reason to believe you do not warrant this seventh block. If so, please state your case here and I or another admin will look into it. --Yamla 16:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The block above is not, I believe, the one I'm talking about. Now, as I have said before, I'll report you as soon as I'm unblocked. As this is currently not the case, I shall continue gathering evidence against you. With the minimum necessary amount of respect, --Edgar Allan Poe.
The only block currently active on this IP address is the one listed above. It was placed at 08:52, February 20, 2006 (this is PROBABLY mountain standard time) by me. It is the first block I have placed on this account, though six other editors have placed previous blocks. As you can see, you were notified within three minutes. Now, as I say, if you have some valid reason to claim this block was not jusified, please speak up. Note, though, that the claims of vandalism are legitimate. --Yamla 16:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct, I'm apologize deeply. I misunderstud the duration of the block and falsely thought there was another block. --Ricardo Lagos.

Your recent edit to Sweden was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 18:56, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. /Magore 20:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Stomach. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Chris (talk) 14:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Venezuela

Your recent edit to Venezuela was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 15:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to China. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Sciurinæ 15:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Thailand. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 17:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during August 21 2006 (UTC) to Baladas En Español

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. - GIen 16:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to High Courts of India. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.  G.He 16:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during August 24 2006 (UTC) to John F. Kennedy

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. 1568 17:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to February 6, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ST47 17:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas Hobbes. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Deli nk 16:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made 17 May 2007 to Heart

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. xC | 17:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Natalia Republic (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for editing Heart (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // MartinBot 17:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

School block

If you wish to contribute to this encyclopedia, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism (see edit log), editing by anonymous users from your school or institution's IP address is currently disabled. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this address is probably also disabled.

If accounts need to be created at school for class projects, please have your teacher or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address and an account will be created for you.

Thank you.

This is a 6 month block. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]


You are cool man!!!!!! you are funny man!!!!! yeeea!!!!! wanna go partyin tonight man???????????

-You should talk to the teachers in charge: James Beasley and Julian Rivera, julian's email: julianrivera@hotmail.com, james' email: jbeasley100@gmail.com

March 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Tabaco City. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Seraphim♥ Whipp 11:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tabaco City, you will be blocked from editing. SMC (talk) 11:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 11:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]


november 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Paulkappelle (talk) 11:08, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Grassland, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Cube lurker (talk) 14:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Beigo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Beigo was changed by 200.55.213.30 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-12-01T15:21:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Inversion (meteorology). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jusdafax 15:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 13:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Exorcism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. from hajatvrc with WikiLove @ 17:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Huldrych Zwingli, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. bobrayner (talk) 18:41, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Huldrych Zwingli. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 18:44, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Huldrych Zwingli. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 18:44, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Huldrych Zwingli, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Limideen 17:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Propaganda during the Reformation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. The wikifyer's corner 19:00, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at International School Nido de Aguilas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. E♴(talk) 19:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]