Jump to content

Talk:Dead Fantasy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.124.128.92 (talk) at 15:54, 12 June 2011 (Notability). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconTelevision NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconVideo games NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
WikiProject iconAnimation: Web NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This redirect is supported by the Web animation work group.

Notability

Article needs mainstream references. Personally I would think the author is more significant than one of his series. Problem is, Wikipedians - esp. the draconic delete delete delete types, are very enamoured of print media and "mainstream" references. The man and his works inhabit a purely internet/geek domain which won't show up much in the NY Times or academic research printed books. Pär Larsson (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At the very least, the character information needs to go; all that stuff is completely irrelevant to the article at hand and is a rather poor duplication of what is already in other character articles. –MuZemike 22:08, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Have got to second that; the character section is little more than a fanboy descent into fantasy storytelling. It is a poorly written attempt at interpretation of the narrative based on the (article's) author's experience with the original source fiction for the characters. But those characters presumably already have fleshed-out descriptions in the articles for those media, and as for the nature of those same characters in their reinterpretation for Dead Fantasy, the character information provided is all inference and guess work, and superfluous in any event.