User talk:Andrewrp

Archives

Second Archive (after account being compromised)

Hi! I'm Andrew, and I like photography and computers. I am also interested in music. I play the violin and piano.

ANDREWRP YOU ARE BIASED BY NOT READING THE EFIK LANGUAGE DISCUSSION FIRST! KWAMI SHOULD NOT HAVE DELETED IBIBIO LANGUAGE PAGE AND RE-DIRECTED IT TO EFIK LANGUAGE BECAUSE THE 2 LANGUAGES ARE DIFFERENT! THE ARE JUST LIKE SPANISH & FRENCH. KWAMI DOES NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT NIGERIAN LANGUAGES, AM A NATIVE IBIBIO SO I AM VERY CONCERN WHEN MISGUIDED INFORMATIONS IS WRITTEN ABOUT IBIBIO. AM SURE YOU WILL NOT IGNORED IT IF SOMEBODY WROTE A LIE ABOUT YOU LIKE, YOU WERE A MURDERER OR WOULD YOU?

 KWAMI DELETED THE IBIBO PHRASES, I HAVE EXPLAINED FOR WEEKS NOW TO KWAMI THAT IBIBIO & EFIK LANGUAGES ARE JUST LIKE SPANISH & FRENCH, RELATED BUT NOT THE SAME, THEREFORE THE SHOULD EACH HAVE A SEPARATE PAGE. ALSO BOTH LANGUAGES ARE OFFICIALY SPOKEN IN DIFFERENT STATES OF NIGERIA.

A Clean Slate

Please see my archive for archived conversations. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 20:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see My Archive

For more info. I am doing this after my account was compromised. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 02:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew, you may wish to consider making a second account for use at public terminals. I did suspect that this was a case of an account being compromised and I'm sure you understand why it was necessary to indeff it. Sorry I wasn't around to unblock you but I work on GMT. Mjroots (talk) 14:46, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So called "Vandalism"

Dear sir, throwing the vandalism accusation at me, you have violated WP:AGF. Do you honestly believe that a longtime wikipedian, and admin at a sister project (ru.wikt) would fall as low as vandalizing articles? Please carefully study the paragraph in subject, and you will realize that I improved it, not vandalized. ~~After that, I expect apology.~~ -- Wesha (talk) 23:20, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. After reviewing the edit history, I realize that I have accidentally deleted the "|thumb" off the Image: tag. Sorry about that. But nevertheless a technical mistake or typo doesn't make vandalism. In the future, please pay closer attention. Always ask yourself question, "why was this done?" -- Wesha (talk) 23:25, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Triserv-600.jpg⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Triserv-600.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 21:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bahá'í gardens by David Shankbone edit 2.jpgA tag has been placed on File:Bahá'í gardens by David Shankbone edit 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RabidDeity (talk) 05:56, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bahá'í gardens by David Shankbone edit 1.jpgA tag has been placed on File:Bahá'í gardens by David Shankbone edit 1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RabidDeity (talk) 05:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:Iron giant wiki.jpg⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iron giant wiki.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]Possibly unfree File:ABC official choir portrait.jpgA file that you uploaded or altered, File:ABC official choir portrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Securel (talk) 18:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:Irongiant4 wiki.jpg⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Irongiant4 wiki.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]Hedgesville High SchoolBe careful of what you revert[1] to <grin>. Granted the deletion had no edit summary, but the content and history is usually worth checking. Cheers. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]No problem. Your work is much appreciated. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]Your AIV report on 217.43.140.62Regarding your report on WP:AN/V, I was looking ath the edits to teh Barrow Raiders article. Are you asserting that the names the editor is added is inconsistent with the currently cited source[2]? That the source is inaccurate or outdated? Or some other problem? Please clarify. Thanks. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 02:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]The info was not cited.It seemed the previous players were correct.Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 20:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]