Talk:Ron Paul presidential campaign developments, 2008

This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-01-05. The result of the discussion was Merge and redirect to Ron Paul presidential campaign, 2008.

United States: Presidential elections Redirect‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections.

United States Redirect‑class

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

References

This has a good summary of the student volunteers in Iowa: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/02/opinion/main3666726.shtml. I'll incorporate it later. Buspar (talk) 00:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Why does this page exist? This is not WikiNews, this is Wikipedia. The existence of this page is grossly inappropriate. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, this page should be deleted, and its contents placed back in the campaign article only after they've been vetted for non-redundancy and notability. --Newsroom hierarchies (talk) 17:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was split off since the original was too large. Since the original is now smaller, it can be re-integrated. I also reformatted this from a straight list to prose form. Given that each candidate has a campaign developments section, this is wholly appropriate for inclusion in the other article. Buspar (talk) 23:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]