Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tyciol

– An SPI clerk has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.

Tyciol

Tyciol (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tyciol/Archive.

25 June 2011

Suspected sockpuppets

Dictabeard (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The talk page refactoring between these two editors are very similar. Tyciol was notorious for refactoring talk pages under the claim that they were "saving space" and was among the reasons the editor was eventually blocked.[1][2][3] Most telling is that Dictabeard also includes adding first level "year" headings to talk pages[4][5] just like Tyciol had done. —Farix (t | c) 13:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I couldn't read that user compare thing you linked so I'm not sure what it says. Not sure how to defend, am I really the first guy to add years since him? DB (talk) 02:29, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Clerk declined - Sorry, Tyciol is a really stale account, so we can't run a CU. This'll have to be determined by behavior. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:57, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]