User talk:MediaMangler

User:Jtkiefer/welcome Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 00:09, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merkey Article

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Waya sahoni 19:20, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I restored verified content in place of your unverified claims. This is a content dispute, not vandalism. -- MediaMangler 20:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-automated template substitution

This page was modified to semi-automatically substitute templates using Pathoschild's template list. // Tawker 19:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Dispute and NPOV Tags

Removal of these tags is a violation of Wikipedia Policy and you can be blocked for it. A dispute has been opened. Like it or not, other editors are going to review this article and you and your friends who spin and distort content had better get used to it. Waya sahoni 06:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you actually provide some verifiable facts to support your position, the tags will eventually be removed again. I may have jumped the gun. — MediaMangler 06:38, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Touch the tags again and I'll ask one of the Administrators working on the project to block you from doing so again. I am not here to rain on your parade, but you and your associates are using Wikipedia as a platform for political and anti-competitive rhetoric about this person. I am here to write about their Native American contributions. This person is native and notable, and I do not appreciate information from our people being skewed and spun by you and your compatriots. The grownups have arrived -- behave and act like you are housebroken on this site. My patience with your antics and vitriolic commentary and personal attacks is at an end. Waya sahoni 06:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry Merkey, I won't remove the tags. I'll leave that for one of the admins when they block your current account in accord with your permanent block. — MediaMangler 06:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More personal attacks and poison. No sense reasoning with someone like you. Waya sahoni 07:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting to Dubious Sources barred by RFC Jeffrey Vernon Merkey

Please do not attempt a revert war on the content. It will only be restored tommorrow and a possible meditation case opened to enforce the RFC. Thanks. Waya sahoni 03:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If Mediamangler won't revert your deletions on the Jeffrey Vernon Merkey article, I will. I'm sure I'm not alone. You've ignored consensus on both the LKML and Jeffrey Vernon Merkey articles. You lost that RFC. You deliberately chose not to count the 9 votes who voted against you in the only way possible that didn't mean signing their name to either a misrepresentation of their argument or an ad-hominem attack on themselves, both written by you. Go ahead and open mediation if you like. Maybe it'll catch the admin's attention long enough for them to do something about this autobiographical POV-warring of yours. --Aim Here 03:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Vandalism on Waya Sahoni User Page

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Waya sahoni 05:12, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are named in an ARBCOM Proceeding regarding Jeffrey Vernon Merkey Article

See WP:ARBCOM for the details. Waya sahoni 04:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet template: unintended consequences

Thanks for the tip about the unintended consequences of my full quotation of the text from WP:SOCK at User_talk:Talks_to_birds#Let.27s_Drop_the_Charade

Certainly not what I had in mind :-/

-- talks_to_birds 23:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]