Talk:Chuluaqui-Quodoushka

Disputed

This article does not seem to be properly sourced, nor is the tone neutral. -Will Beback 01:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article was researched properly

Sourced from numerous published articles, and also from the Manual of the subject in question. Tone has been adjusted to a degree sufficent to allow neutral perspectives from non-predisposed participants, but preponderence of information leads to a natural perception of non-neutral bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerry Cornelius (talk • contribs)

Jerry, I do see great improvements made towards a more neutral tone. However, Will is also right that even if the information in the article came from good sources, it doesn't seem to be -- what information came from which sources isn't listed. I've sourced one of the quotes in the article as an example of how it can be done. Anything done to show people where the facts they're reading are coming from will improve the article overall. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm Ok.... That's really quite clever....

I did not notice how to do, or even think of doing that sort of thing.
I readily see your point....  In fact I can say I embrace it...
Ok, that gives me serious food for thought....  I thank you....
J. Cornelius... March 13 2006