Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 41

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) at 06:45, 28 June 2011 (Archiving 6 thread(s) from Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive 35←Archive 39Archive 40Archive 41Archive 42Archive 43→Archive 45

adriana-mugnatto-hamu

I don't know why the article was deleted - I'm guessing lack of notability. I don't know if I'm using the right process to find out - any help would be appreciated. I'm not yet contesting the deletion - I don't even have any information about why it was done, so I wouldn't presume to contest the reasoning. -Bobagem (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

It's actually quite easy to find out why it was deleted. The title of the article above is red, which shows that the article does not exist. However if you click on that "redlink" and the article did once exist, you will see the deletion log which shows who deleted it, when and why. In this case it gives a reference to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu. The reference to WP:POLITICIAN there is to a policy which says that (to discourage use of Wikipedia as an election campaign platform), merely being an unelected candidate for political office does not confer notability. If you want to pursue this, you should first approach user Cirt (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Grant George

Over-zealous editor removing an article on a prolific voice actor. I mean come on - look at the sheer number of pages that link to him - even from other wikis that cover his roles! -203.122.219.202 (talk) 00:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Other wikis are not reliable sources; neither is the IMDb, nor his own websites. Oh, look: that seems to eliminate all the "sources"! --Orange Mike | Talk 00:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
I'll also add that this was an unsourced BLP. I'm usually the first to argue that contested PRODs should be restored without any hassle but in cases like this it's better to leave it deleted but allow any editor to write a new sourced article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

CreditLoan.com

The article was deleted on the basis of G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion; however the criteria states that "An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." The article on CreditLoan is neutral. No negative information was available or it would have been included. The article explains what the website is, and who is behind it. It is a high traffic site, with a large number of financial articles, and is described and referenced in the Wikipedia article, but no recommendations or suggestions of patronage are made. Please reconsider and undelete. -RiverWriter (talk) 02:53, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

PSY (Korean Hip Hop Singer)

Psy is a legendary singer in Korea and deserves a Wikipedia page. The issue was "Expired PROD, concern was: no third party sources to indicate notability". Not sure what that means, but he is definitely a "notable" person. Ask any Korean =P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.53.199.60 (talk • contribs)

 Not done Though deleted by PROD this was an unsourced BLP. However, any editor with an account is free to create a new sourced article on this subject. I'll also be happy to incubate this article upon request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

OTRS permission received in ticket 2011061410014865 for all content under http://www.parkerpoe.com/about-us/ -– Adrignola talk 19:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Some of the content was from other sub-pages of the site, does the ticket cover that as well? January (talk) 20:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Done, removed content from other sub-pages in the meantime. January (talk) 21:02, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Even if they are cleared, it might be better not to add back the other sections, which could well get it speedied G11, being all first-person and peacock terms: "We are proud of our TerraLex relationship and the global resources it brings to all of our clients.... dedicated to providing a quick response to clients' needs... innovative solutions... ongoing and immediate benefit to clients of our firm..." JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
My statement that "all content under" may have been ambiguous, so to clarify, that page and all subpages. – Adrignola talk 20:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Indian media bias in politics

In India News groups are in business houses hands . Business houses area alaways foucs on their interst. Also this is a big story in past how business houses are beneifited by Indian Govt. So news/ media can be biased or in favour of Govt as all business in india has deep influnce/controll from Govt.

As a Citinizen of India I feel we should know all information arround such topic. I would request you to open this link

Regards Indian -134.159.168.104 (talk) 07:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Redirects to Media bias in India, no previous article in the history or logs. Target has been proposed for deletion but is not yet deleted, if this is the article you meant please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. January (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Since the article had previously been discussed at AFD and also considering this "misplaced" challenge. I went ahead and removed the PROD. However, this won't prevent someone from taking it to AFD if they wish. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:AFL-Uniform-Current-COL.PNG

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Colorado Crush. -Zundark (talk) 09:06, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 12:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Check_Into_Cash

I could not find much information in the deletion log other than "blatant advertising." That can easily be remedied and I would like to look at the original material and get this article re-published, informatively. Information can be added - I see no reason for the article to be deleted without a chance to revise it. Thanks. -Checkn2cash (talk) 12:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

The original material contained canned marketing phrases like "As a leader in the payday lending industry, the company offers small, short-term loans...". No independent sources or any sourcing of any kind to verify the claims. Written by the company, (your account name does seem to have a conflict of interest), I would suggest you read the Business FAQ first to understand our policies. -- Alexf(talk) 13:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Hey boys and girls (truth of the world pt 2).jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Hey Boys and Girls (Truth of the World pt.2). -Zundark (talk) 14:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done I'll give you 24 hours to add it to an article. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, but as I said in the request, it's already in an article. --Zundark (talk) 16:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:KishMauveBlackHeartAlbumCover.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Black Heart (album). -Zundark (talk) 15:45, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

As above. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Boys Don't Cry.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Boys Don't Cry (album). -Zundark (talk) 16:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 16:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:HoldYou.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Hold You (album). -Zundark (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 16:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Lalbum.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in L (album). -Zundark (talk) 16:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Outbreed.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Outbreed (album). -Zundark (talk) 17:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 21:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Roustabout.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Roustabout (album). -Zundark (talk) 18:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 21:31, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:The Shit.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in The Shit (album). -Zundark (talk) 18:32, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 21:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

nanoceramic

reasoning -Kmparnell (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello,

Not to sure why this has been selected for deletion. I have re-read it and it is factual and educational. I'm beginning to think that women are being cyber bullied by this website!!

Karen

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. As to the other: HORSEFEATHERS AND POPPYCOCK! Nobody knew or cared as to the gender of the creator of the article; but we require verifiable citations from reliable sources as a necessary component of articles: and that's what was being asked for. Gender bias is too important an issue for this kind of nonsense to distract us. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:45, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

The Armory Foundation

OTRS permission confirmed in ticket 2011061710012325. -– Adrignola talk 20:52, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 21:11, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Nena Daconte-He Perdido Los Zapatos-Frontal-1-.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in He perdido los zapatos. -Zundark (talk) 20:54, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:The Legendary Pink Dots - Malachai (Shadow Weaver Part 2).jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Malachai. -Zundark (talk) 20:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Memphis Drama Vol3.jpeg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Memphis Drama Vol. 3: Outta Town Luv. -Zundark (talk) 08:33, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:The Dandenong Journal - 1966 21th Apr - page 1.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Westall UFO. -Zundark (talk) 08:42, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

  • The image proposed is used in a gallery, normally not allowed, can you supply a reason why it should be used, rather than a description of what it says with a reference? Also the image was over 1000 pixels high, as need to make the text of a newspaper page readable, but this would be too large for a fair use. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
If you think the image should remain deleted for reasons other than the one for which it was deleted, that's OK with me. (As for adding a description of what it says to the article, I obviously have no objection to that, but I can't do it myself, because I don't know what it says.) --Zundark (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply and thanks for the good work deorphaning images. I will mark this Not done for reasons that use is not fair. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:MacKillop Catholic Regional College Werribee crest.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in MacKillop Catholic Regional College, Werribee. -Zundark (talk) 08:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Girlicious - Baby doll.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Baby Doll (song). -Zundark (talk) 09:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Cruel.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Cruel (song). -Zundark (talk) 10:50, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:hallohallo.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Hallo Hallo (Ace of Base song). -Zundark (talk) 16:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 17:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:BonniePinkMorningGlory.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Morning Glory (Bonnie Pink song). -Zundark (talk) 16:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 17:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Strasbourgcover.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Strasbourg (song). -Zundark (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 19:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:CD SUPR LRG.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Supernatural (Hillsong album). -Zundark (talk) 17:48, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 19:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Finger Puppet Games

Provided ample justification for validity and significance of page and it was deleted without discussion. Very bad form. Please reply and discuss.-Questmachine (talk) 22:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Not done This could just as easily have been deleted as a G11 for its promotional tone. This is a brand-new company which hasn't even issued any product yet; the author seems to feel that reflected importance of a city, an executive, etc. is sufficient to make up for a complete lack of any asserted notability of the subject itself. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:15, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Kay Kristin Boutilier

The article was deleted under A7 and G11 criteria if I remember correctly. As the author, I felt as though neither of these reasons were valid and had been performing edits to ensure, for example, that there was nothing that could be taken as advertising or promotion of any particular group or entity. The article was well referenced and unbiased. The article was about a musician and under the criteria listed in the wikipedia guide as to the relevance of musicians/bands/singers, the subject met multiple of the suggested reasons for being included in wikipedia. I believe that the article was not only deleted without justification, but also before edits/discussion was complete- which should have been obvious by examination of the talk section for the article, in which a discussion on numerous points was being had with the person who had tagged it for speedy deletion to begin with. As the contributor of the article, I think it was deleted without proper review and would appreciate its restoration. Finally, a point that was brought up in the talk was that it was a possible COI, however, I would like to assure that this was not the case. Thank you for the time. -Wiki86420 (talk) 02:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Image:Logo landbank.png

orpharned because it was replaced by a version uploaded on the Commons. That version is now deleted. This image will be restored to Land Bank of the Philippines. -Bluemask (talk) 08:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 13:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

File:St. Augustine's College Yarraville Logo (black and white).jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in St. Augustine's College, Yarraville. -Zundark (talk) 08:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 13:51, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Reading Cloggies

reasoning -ChrisJBrady (talk) 09:15, 19 June 2011 (UTC) This page was deleted DESPITE the Talk feature requsting that this not be done. Further - there was no communication from the administrators saying that this would happen. i am not going to waste my life creating pages only to have them arrogantly deleted by self-appointed administrations who know nothing about the subject AND who don't have the courtesy to communicate with the authors they hack and delete. Never again.

 Not done. Administrators are not "self-appointed" - they are appointed by the community after a fairly tough grilling and a selection process that lasts a week, and they work to standards agreed by the community. You were notified on your talk page that the article had been tagged for speedy deletion; the notice gave the reasons and relevant links, and it also explained that an article which meets the criteria for speedy deletion, in this case WP:CSD#A7, may be deleted without delay. If you click on the "redlink" to the article, you will see the deletion log which will tell you that the article was deleted by user Nyttend (talk), and he is the person you should approach if you want to proceed. First, read Wikipedia:Your first article and consider whether you can show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to meet Wikipedia's notability requirement; if so, ask Nyttend (perhaps more politely than this request?) to userfy the article - copy it into a user sub-page - for you to work on. JohnCD (talk) 17:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

JCI Bangladesh

It is not a advertise rather share the activities about active citizenship which the organization is pursuing for the betterment of the community -Mahibekram (talk) 10:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. The first few versions of your article were too promotional; also, they were copied from your website, which is not allowed unless a formal copyright release has been made. The last version was not promotional, but it still did not give any reason why the organisation was important or significant enough to have an encyclopedia article. In Wikipedia terms, that's called notability, and is not a matter of opinion: it has to be demonstrated by showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. The test is, have people independent of the organization thought it important enough to write substantial comment about? More advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 18:16, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Frank Lauren Hitchcock (1875-1957).jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Frank Lauren Hitchcock. -Zundark (talk) 10:42, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

This Week in Tennis

I believe This Week in Tennis article should be undeleted because I wasn't able to add additional information to article before it was deleted. I figured I'd have to add onto article in a timely fashion and didn't know about the Speedy Deletion method. This Week in Tennis is similar to Tennis Week which currently has an article on Wikipedia even though it's no longer in business. Thank you for your consideration. -Mickle75 (talk) 13:36, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Mickle75/This Week in Tennis. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Sphilbrick (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Amaranthe

I believe this band meets Wikipedia notability criteria. There are four pages in different projects (check the Swedish page), the band has two independently notable musicians (Olof Mörck and Elize Ryd), their first album charted in at least two countries's national music chart (check this reference) and the band has been the subject of multiple published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself (check the Portuguese page). If necessary I help to improve the page. Thank you for your consideration. 189.74.193.181 (talk) 04:32, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Girls-aint-nothing-but-trouble-single.gif

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Girls Ain't Nothing but Trouble. -Zundark (talk) 10:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

PKsoft

PKsoft is an real company in Sri Lanka -Pasindu Kavinda  Talk 12:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

  •  Not done Yes it's a real company but none of the deleted versions were able to state what set it apart from the millions of other "real companies" in this world. The Cuban restaurant a block from where I live is also a "real company" (and it serves pretty good food) but it doesn't have an article nor should it. See WP:CORP. Also, the article was created and deleted multiple times by the same editor who was eventually blocked for spamming. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


subhash sasidhrakurup

biography -Sujathasubhash (talk) 12:50, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

 Not done I'm sorry that your first experiences here were negative. The subject (whether you or not) sounds like an amazing person but unfortunately the world is full of amazing people and the article failed to state what set him apart from all the other network security engineers in the world. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:04, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Juiced-JoseCanseco.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Juiced: Wild Times, Rampant 'Roids, Smash Hits & How Baseball Got Big. -Zundark (talk) 15:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 17:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

silvertech

I purposely kept any client name, services, etc. out of the silvertech article. The article was created as it is the company that purchased a historic building, Ash Street School, in Manchester, New Hampshire and therefore felt the basic listing was appropriate. -Jeffmcpherson (talk) 18:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_41&oldid=436631630"