Talk:Lotus Renault
Appearance
Formula One Disambig‑class | |||||||
|
Redirect or disambiguation page?
Why redirect? Better a list of possible Lotus Reanult. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ingen Alls (talk • contribs) 13:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to agree. Just because Renault's F1 team is now officially Lotus Renault doesn't change the fact Lotuses powered by Renaults pre-existed it & are called Lotus-Renaults (& are probably going to be searched as Lotus Renault by people who don't know better...). This leaves them not knowing where to go. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 04:12, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree, and can't see anyone wanting either the new or old Team Lotuses searching for "Lotus Renault". This is undoubtedly a case of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC—Google Lotus Renault and see how many results you get that are about Team Lotus, new or old (and not about the two modern constructors "Renault" and "Lotus"). A hatnote at Lotus Renault GP is sufficient. JonChappleTalk 06:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- People know bit formel 1 this year say Lotus for green Lotus, not black Lotus. Green Lotus Renault is called Lotus, black Lotus Renault is not called Lotus, black Lotus Renault is called Renault. So is it also on Wikipedia. "Lotus Renault" must show both.Ingen Alls (talk) 07:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree, and can't see anyone wanting either the new or old Team Lotuses searching for "Lotus Renault". This is undoubtedly a case of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC—Google Lotus Renault and see how many results you get that are about Team Lotus, new or old (and not about the two modern constructors "Renault" and "Lotus"). A hatnote at Lotus Renault GP is sufficient. JonChappleTalk 06:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)