User talk:Anna Frodesiak

If I started a thread on your talk page, I am watching. Please reply there. To leave me a message click here.

Archives

1-22, 23

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For everything you do. :) ZooPro 01:57, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Tireless, eh? What if I'm completely pooped? Can I still keep it? :) Kidding. Thanks so much!! Did you know that when you get 100 barnstars, Jimbo posts you a 1/2 kilo Toblerone? Best wishes and thank you again. You've made my regular morning Wikipedia session/watermelon-eating-fest very pleasant. :) :) :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:14, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

I was not aware Jimbo did that.....the most he has ever sent me is a hoodie shirt :) I feel very lucky to have it. ZooPro 13:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Really. I'm not making it up. :) Seriously, a hoodie is way better because it won't melt in the sun. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Macros

Hey, how do I do that? For example, all of the time, I need to type things like "must be verified by reliable sources. I'd love to be able to hit a single complex key-stroke (like ctrl-shit-V, or something like that) and have it spit out verified. Is there a browser extension (I use FF), or is it a separate program that I can use across multiple other programs?

Also, I made a bunch of additions to Dimbeswar Neog, and left a note about on my talk page. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your help on Dimbeswar Neog.

There are keyboard macro programs available at freeware sites. I haven't tried them. I use macros in Word and EditpadPro. For pasting in the same thing again and again, I keep a tab open in edit mode with those kinds of things. I just grab and paste. I keep it open for edit so I can paste junk in where it says BUNNY. [1] Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:45, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Was that a Freudian slip up there, Q ? "Ha! that statement lacks a reliable source, so I'm gonna hit ctrl-shit ..." <g> - Sitush (talk) 15:06, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Something nobody else yet has on Wikipedia

	The Mysterious Bunny award
	This might be to honor your good humor and sweetness that have made Wikipedia a better place for so many editors, including me. Or it might be because I am curious to know why you use "BUNNY" in templates. Bunnies are much less trouble than kittens, although they can cause trouble if they multiply rapidly. Kinda like Wikilove. Sharktopus talk 19:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the unique award. It's very nice! That Toblerone is only a decade away now.

I like bunnies because they pulled themselves out of a hat: They are slow-witted, thus don't know how insane Earth is, breed like crazy, can run away from baddies, happily relocate from destroyed habitats, and quite fortunately, do not taste good to people. Unlike pigs, they must find this planet a rather nice place. That's encouraging. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Aw, sorry to disappoint you, Anna. There's nothing quite like a (wild) rabbit pie. Deboning is a pain but the taste is not dis-similar to chicken, with a slightly different texture. Hare is stronger ... but I need to remember that WP is not a cookbook. - Sitush (talk) 23:38, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

True, but relatively few bunnies end up in the pot. Compare it to the 100 million tons of piggies (a lot of squeals) and 80 million tons of chicken (a lot of bucks) consumed each year.[2] Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

For you

With love. Drmies (talk) 01:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Ahhh, thank you from all of us! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:29, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Hi Anna, just thought I'd drop by for a cup of tea with you in your cafe. You seem to be popping up everywhere lately! Random corners of the Wiki that I happen to surf into and I keep seeing 'Anna F' contributing on some matter or other. You must be on some supercharged energy source, ;) Antarctic-adventurer (talk) 10:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, my friend. You are too kind, and always welcome for tea. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

For the welcome and the work on Hainanese Chicken Rice.Mphil1805 (talk) 13:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

My pleasure. If there's anything you ever need, just ask. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

FYI, Anna. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 15:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the info.

“ No, there warn't no real scarcity of snakes about the house for a considerable spell. You'd see them dripping from the rafters and places every now and then; and they generly landed in your plate, or down the back of your neck, and most of the time where you didn't want them. (Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain, 1884) ”

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Stop

The rest of the things everything else is allowed --27.3.18.100 (talk) 14:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Baking powder? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

J. Gowers

Hi -- I don't think we've interacted before, but I saw your sensible comment at User_talk:J.Gowers#You_can_choose. The latest issue is the dog picture he's uploaded, claiming a CC 2.0 license. It's actually taken from here.

I'm not familiar with copyvio notices, and hoped you might be more knowledgeable and could tag this appropriately. If you're not I'll do the research and dig up the right notice. I don't know if that editor is salvageable, but it's usually worth a couple of tries; I don't see much evidence yet of willingness to make positive contributions, though. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Mike. I appreciate the support. I've had a silly habit lately of trying to encourage some editors to reform their ways with the hope that they will become a net asset. A bit of an experiment.

As for the image, I don't know where to report it other than here or here. I hope you can find out. Sorry I'm not being more helpful with that.

As for the salvageability of the editor in question, who knows? The trollsome edits smack of short-term nuissance and long-term block. But, I hope he just understands that he's hurting a project he uses and is wasting the time of nice people volunteering.

Best wishes. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the pointer; I've listed it at WP:PUF, which I found via the link you gave me. I think that's the right place. I see you're an online ambassador, as I am; mentoring new users is a good way to restore one's trust in random editors, and I find that an inspiring program though my mentees have varied in their abilities and commitment. Best wishes likewise. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:12, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your outstanding work at hacking List of shipbuilders and shipyards down to a much more visually appealing and useful size, you have earned the Editor's Barnstar! Keep up the good work! :-) Hersfold (t/a/c) 06:24, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

It's lovely! Thank you so much, and thank you also for your thoughtful advice. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:40, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

International Space Station

The conditions were nice and clear for watching the International Space Station flyby tonight. Hoping the next few days are good as well. Can you see it where you are? Viriditas (talk) 09:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Wow! I hope so. I've tried before to figure out the times from the NASA site. It was always low on the horizon and I never saw it, or I was just to dumb to get it right. A very blue sky today, so it might be good. Is it bright? I have a telescope. Would it be a dot or could I see shape? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:40, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

It's really easy, and fun! All you need to know are the orbital parameters, the time, and where to look in the sky. No, you don't need a telescope. It's so big and bright you can see it very clearly, although all you see is a bright dot at night. Plus, it is way, way too fast for a regular telescope. There's no way you would be able to follow it! If you have a smartphone, you can download several free apps to keep on top of it. I use ISSLite on the iPhone, but you can check it here. Simply enter your country and follow the location prompts. You can also track it here. Viriditas (talk) 09:52, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Smartphone? I have the Forest Gump of phones. Using the links, I will try. I will go on the roof and let you know. Thanks!!! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Can you move this image for me?

For some reason, the image name I used did not take. As a result, I uploaded File:5796953341 7fbeffb70f o.jpg instead of File:Warder Clyde Allee.jpg. Could you move the current image (File:5796953341 7fbeffb70f o.jpg) to the new name (File:Warder Clyde Allee.jpg)? Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 12:26, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Done Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks! Viriditas (talk) 12:30, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Christanandjericho

I'm afraid I beat you to the punch, reporting him at WP:AIV. He's had, what, 10 chances across two accounts? He needs to get the message I think - JohnInDC (talk) 13:00, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!! 12 mainspace edits!!! I hope it's indef. Good riddance. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:07, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Please see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Certified.Gangsta and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:User_pages/UI_spoofing#Addtional_.22new_message.22_opinions i am allowed to have it please read the whole disscussion --Vince (talk) 13:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

I couldn't care less. You had a fork in the roads:

1. Be an editor and accomplish something. Be proud of yourself.
2. Show up at Wikipedia. Do absolutely nothing for the mainspace. Waste the time of volunteers. Make trollsome edits. Get blocked within a week, the experience being utter failure.

It's your life story, pal. You can write the chapters anyway you want. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Perhaps this?

Anna, you could use a combination of more than one template. I would recommend using the most appropriate warning template first as per WP:USETEMP (use only Level 4im templates), then use this template: {{Template:ONETIMEWARN}}.

An example goes like this (only use after using the appropriate template(s) as per WP:USETEMP):

• "{{Template:ONETIMEWARN}} Vandalism" produces the following: Template:ONETIMEWARN Vandalism.

You could sometimes use the Wikipedia rules in the notification (e.g. as per WP:BLOCK). CHAK 001 (talk) 00:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

This guy isn't worth the effort. As far as I'm concerned, pasting the message from the black sandbox is the easiest way. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Not worth the effort? Your template also works OK, but after my evaluation, I think severe warnings was not even mentioned in your template, which is the reason why I put both the Level 4im template message(s) and the supplement template, along with appropriate inserts. I do recommend doing so in case of vandalism, specifically if the size of the vandalism edit is severe or continuous (more than three edits) that deems necessary action. Those are only my suggestions, though. CHAK 001 (talk) 04:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I just mean that the message at black sandbox does the trick. What's the difference between pasting a template and pasting a paragraph. Besides, the term "severe" seems odd to me because it's not commensurate with the punishment, which is not so severe after all. Plus, it's sort of a weather term. Promise them that a severe tornado will hit their house and I'm in like a dirty shirt. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Fluffer

Why were you so adament do have that disgusting and degrading picture on the top for Fluffer? That is not fit for human eyes. Can I ask you not to reinstate it, thankyou. I'm not being personal here but you're not a lesbian by chance are you? Can't see why a girl so badly wishes for that kind of image to stay. Proud Serbian Chetnik (talk) 08:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I am adamant because the image shows the subject, and does so without showing a lot of junk. Also, there is no replacement, and the image was removed without consensus.

May I ask, if it were two women, would you feel the same way?

I'm not being personal here but you're not a straight male homophobe by chance are you? Can't see why a boy so badly wishes for that kind of image to go. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Wow, a much more humorous of a response than the scathing one that first occurred to me. P.S., to Proud Serbian Chetnik: take a look at WP:NOTCENSORED. It should help you understand our rules on why we include images and text that some people find "offensive". Qwyrxian (talk) 09:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Chetnik, the reasoning behind your asking that question is highly obnoxious. And yes, you should look at WP:NOTCENSORED as Qwy said. Also please remember that homophobia (which you have displayed in a few of your edits, while a misguided view that you are allowed to have on your own, is very much frowned upon here when you actually let it get into your edits. In fact, it goes against WP:NPOV. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 12:29, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

No ofcourse I wouldn't mind if it was two girls. It's completely different, it is acceptable and has been so for a longer time. But men? yuk. It is not accepted internationally yet. You never told me, you're not a lesbian are you? Proud Serbian Chetnik (talk) 23:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

You are just trolling. Back off. - Sitush (talk) 23:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Please note that I have brought up this "conversation" in the currently open ANI thread on Proud Serbian Chetnik; if any of the participants here wish to comment, it's at WP:ANI#User:Proud Serbian Chetnik. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Hainan

If you don't object, I will merge the content of {{County-level divisions of Hainan}} to {{Hainan}}, as has been done for the templates for every other province/region of mainland China. I feel that the much more detailed amount of content in {{Hainan}} gives some undue weight, but I suppose we can afford something like this for {{Hainan}} because of the low number of county-level divisions on the island. —HXL: 聊天 (T) 和 貢獻 (C) 23:35, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello my friend. I'm not crazy about the idea.

When you say "...undue weight...", do you mean to Hainan over other provinces?

When you say "...has been done for the templates for every other province/region of mainland China...", I just looked at a few. It seems that you merged them. Could you please point me to the discussion that occurred before you did that?

The fact that other provinces have it this way doesn't make it best. Visitors to an article about some chicken dish certainly don't want a fat template containing half Prefecture-level cities and Administration Office for Xisha Islands. That template is best for articles about cities, towns, etc.

This essay makes good sense: They should be kept small in size as a large template has limited navigation value. For navigating among many articles, consider splitting them into multiple, smaller templates on each sub-topic.

In fact, I want to propose the system Hainan is using for other provinces. Now, almost all provinces have nothing at all like { {Hainan} }, and only templates like { {tld|County-level divisions of Hainan} }.

Templates in articles such as Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui are typical. The templates are of no interest to visitors to non-place articles. And, these provinces lack templates like { { Hainan } }. Would you be interested in cooperating to create these templates?

What I made is modelled on Gibraltar, Hawaii, etc., by the way. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:45, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Responding point by point...1) Undue weight...yes over the other provinces. 2) As per policy on consensus, a complete lack of opposition is to be taken as tacit consensus. The only person that I had discussed the mass mergers with at the time was LLTimes. 3) Something as specific as a chicken dish should not be featured so prominently in a provincial template anyway... And would they be better served by a cuisine navigation template? 4) If we are going to include a potpourri of random specific subjects, we obviously will not have the space. I suggest trimming it down to what the templates for the US states do. 5) Well we can use Hainan as a testing area, and then move on to the rest? The template for the state of Virginia lists all of its 140 county-level divisions, and that has stayed for years, indicating readers don't have much of an issue seeing them there. Except for Hebei (170 or so) and Sichuan (180 or so), listing all of the county-level divisions won't be too problematic if we downsize the list as well. As far as I see it, when for example, an "old" Chinese was raised in a county-level division (Y) outside of prefecture X's metro area, they are more likely to identify with Y, not X. Combine this with the level of sacredness Chinese people take their ancestral homes... and you can't really remove the counties. 6) I would be willing to model after what ZH-Wiki is doing... do a search for, say, Template:吉林, and you won't find one. The editors there have split topics off. I recommend that part, but still modelling after the US states (broad topics, counties/county-level divisions). 7) It seems you are modelling much more after Gibraltar than Hawaii.

If we still do not have a solution, I think this discussion should move to somewhere more centralised. Not at all a small matter, but I still think a bottom-top approach is more efficient. —HXL: 聊天 (T) 和 貢獻 (C) 03:51, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

1) Well, I'm not sure undue weight is a problem when it comes to provinces. It's not like they compete. Anyway, let's leave that till last. If we embark on a navbox improvement for all China, that will become moot.

2) There was no discussion before hand. That's no problem at all. You boldly did it and nobody barked. That's fine by me.

3) Hainanese Chicken Rice can be left out of the navbox, but certainly the template is appropriate in the article. Thus, good rationale for splitting the templates, as those visitors won't care much about county-level divisions.

4) Some trimming makes sense. I would go with overall physical size, more than anything. Comprehensive, yet visually navigable.

5) As for a separate county-level division navbox: The more the merrier if in its own navbox. A complete listing is best.

6) Hainan as a testing area is a great plan for { { Hainan } }. If you are referring to a combined navbox as a model, I'm not sure about that. I'm not sure we need a model for { { County-level XXX } }. All provinces already have that sorted out. What they are missing is { { Hainan } }. I suggest we make a model and present it at Wikiproject China. Such a template can really give a great at-a-glance view of the flavour of the provinces. A real asset, I think. As it stands now, the differences between provinces are unknown to outsiders. The navboxes can really help.

7) How can you model after what ZH-Wiki is doing if you say they've all split off? I don't understand.

8) Gibraltar or Hawaii, both have the right idea. The bottom line (no joke intended) is for visitors to get a good overview without shopping through widely-scattered categories. The Hainan template, as it is now is pretty good, as far as I am concerned. As more Hainan articles are created, swap in the better ones, keeping the overall size the same.

I think we're fundamentally on the same page here: We both want to visitors to learn as much as possible about each province, in the easiest way possible. Where we part slightly, is that I think fat county-level navboxes should be separate. But I hope to convince you that, when expanded to the lovely { { Hainan } } example size, keeping them apart makes sense both aesthetically, for ease of navigation, and for the ability to omit one when necessary.

Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:42, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

6) Hainan is the least of our worries in including administrative divisions because there only are 23 of them. I agree to disagree with you for most other provinces/regions, but not Hainan and possibly not Ningxia. I suggest a simple vote on the county-level divisions to resolve this matter, and it's about time we moved this discussion anyway. Whatever we do, we need a PRC province navigation box on each provincial template.

7) ZH-Wiki has one template for the county-level divisions, higher education institutions, protection areas, and key CCP officials as far as I can see, and I don't see entire templates dedicated anything else.

8) I still fail to understand you...the Hawaii template is much sparser and you are a comparing a state template to a territory topics template, as well as an easily-spotted-on-the-world-map archipelago versus a tiny city. —HXL: 聊天 (T) 和 貢獻 (C) 23:53, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

6) I will stay out of decision about administrative divisions and what should be included. I do care that they are not part of the main template that has lots of topics. I really think visitors don't ordinarily care much about administrative divisions.

7) Can you give me an url?

8) Sorry. I did not remember correctly. See Barbados template and Wales template. Those are what I had in mind.

So what can we agree on here? Whatever you say about administrative divisions navboxes I will agree to. Can you agree with a Hainan-style or Barbados-style or Wales-style template? I think visitors will absolutely love it.

Let's see if we can get on the same page here, then propose something at project China. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

A bit of notice again...

Anna, I have now put up a warning against the user that was suspected of doing personal attack at your talk page while I kept a lookout (since I do not intend to use any personal attacks on anyone's talk page). You can find it here. CHAK 001 (talk) 01:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Bollocks Oops. - Sitush (talk) 01:40, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

CHAK: Once again you've made me spit tea all down my front. :) :) :) Did you just severely warn Sitush for adding "You are just trolling. Back off." to my talk page? Sitush is a wiki-angel. Proud Serbian Chetnik is, well, hmmm, not. Thanks though. I know your heart is in the right place. :)

Sitush: Thanks. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

I may have got the wrong end of a long stick with Chak's warning. It was, however, ridiculous even if it may possibly have been well-intentioned I do believe that it may have induced my most severe case of the Anglo-Saxons ever here, albeit struck out. Needs to take a little more care, as I notice a tendency towards the use of single-issue warnings, even in those cases where some sort of warning might be appropriate. Which this was not. Anyways, 0300 and off to bed. - Sitush (talk) 02:03, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Heh. I don't know who to feel worse for here—Sitush, Anna or CHAK? :-) Viriditas (talk) 06:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm perfectly fine. I sort of just watched the storm go by. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

I must say, you handled the personal remarks very well from User:Proud Serbian Chetnik. His behaviour looks here to have caused a stir but you know he's been blocked. He is largely our problem (that is we who edit on Balkan topics) as we now know his identity (atleast on Wikipedia). He is a sockpuppet of the notorious User:Sinbad Barron. It won't concern you that this political editing was mostly a front as he was awaiting the moment to spit out his real views which differed to his earlier contributions! The homophobia seemed genuine though, and prepositioning you was repugnant. This is why I say, top marks for handling it the way many of us wouldn't have, with smiles and soft words!! He won't hound you any more now, or be all around you (are you this? are you that?) whilst cancelling your edits. Good riddance! Evlekis (Евлекис) 08:03, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words. I think he let his emotions get the better of him. I just watched The Weight of Chains, and it left my head spinning. I can see how feelings get stirred up.

As for the homophobia, I guess he was just raised in closed-off way. Maybe he's not from the city.

People, huh. So much progress and all this species does is believe men in suits, kill each other, and chase the latest iPod. Really impressive. Some say they were born into the wrong era, some the wrong gender. Me? I'm on the wrong planet. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:21, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

My dear, if you are for another planet, let me come with you! Don't talk badly about yourself. If everyone here were like you (looking at your general edits on talk) then the project would be a true success. I don't even consider myself as constructive as you and this both for discussion and main article editing. Regarding the user. Nothing is known about him. He has a farm of puppets and these people have declared themselves of every nationality and it all leads to politics. It has occurred to me that the user is more an apologist for New World Order than a specific "national"; unfortunately, the Balkans-based editors take the hit. Even those whose side the user is technically on find him disruptive. Evlekis (Евлекис) 08:40, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Oh well. I'm glad it's done with. Now we can all get back to work. Thank you again and best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:43, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Any time. Keep up the good contributions. :) Evlekis (Евлекис) 08:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

RCp proposal

Adamrce, Anna_Frodesiak, Baseball_Bugs, Csloomis, Cntras, Evaders99, Fæ, Shrike, Qwyrxian, WWGB, Who.was.phone:
met you guys at edit conflicts for undoing vandalism/ warning the same vandals/reporting at AIV.
I've made a proposal at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Recent_Changes-_tags_for_patrolled_and_reverted_edits. This is regarding managing vandalism at RCP. What do you think?Staticd (talk) 11:20, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Citizen Cyborg

I've fixed the Citizen Cyborg article so I've removed the copyvio tag. --Loremaster (talk) 16:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Good stuff, my friend. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Check it again. ;) --Loremaster (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

A dandy infobox indeed. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:36, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Wilensky's

Nice pics on Wilensky's! Do you happen to have any that clearly shows the Wilensky's (yellow smile), coca cola, and green "moe wilensky" signs?Jeanpetr (talk) 21:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

I have a bunch more. (Sorry about the low quality.) Memorabilia, class of coke, sandwich with two meats, more interiors, fuzzy pic of a yellow smile that looks like a pot of mustard. If you like, I'll email you the lot. You can upload them as your own, public domain. But, I suggest cropping, brightening, saturating, sharpening with Irfan or the like. They're pretty rough. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:19, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	For your persistant helpfulness and guidance to User:Gorlack36! v/r - TP 02:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very, very much. I am always pleased to help any editor that has promise of great productivity. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Michi-Ohio State talk page

Thank you for contributing to the ongoing discussion at the Mich-OSU rivalry talk page. Please note that I have read your comments and responded. Levdr1lostpassword (talk) 23:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

I have run out of reasons.......lol.... ZooPro 10:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you again. You are so sweet, as was the cupcake. I don't know what I've done to deserve this. You say you've run out of reasons? Well, yesterday I broke up a fight between two of my hamsters. I would have clunked their little heads together, but they're covered in fur, so it probably wouldn't have done much good. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:00, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Page move

Are you sure I can move Koontz House (Natchez, Mississippi) to Green Leaves, without it being considered vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atterion (talk • contribs) 18:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Philippine Basketball League

Hello Khazar,

Since I had no idea what all these orphan tag being added, and all those unreference tag, i'll ask what references do I have to add more, all those pages I created are the ones i've also write down in the external links given, such as in Philippine basketball forum sites, do I have to scan my article research and put it in a blogspot and then provide as many external links so as to prove my work.(Edmon74 01:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC))

I think you might be looking for User talk:Khazar.

I you mean me, forgive me for not understanding. I don't see the tags you're talking about.

Please find sources that are independent of you. That means no blogspot article research that you made. Also, forums aren't good. Try newspaper articles. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

My apologies to you, yes my message was for Khazar, somehow when I click his talk page, the link redirects to your user talk, again my apologies, ignore my message(Edmon74 04:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC))

Your comments about IRC

Thank you Anna for leaving me nice messages on my user talk page. I was asking for help, saying "Hello, how are you?, If you're not busy, then I need some help?" is not trolling. Please tell me your definition of Trolling. I am currently on a WikiCurfew and am only allowed to edit user talk pages. I am guessing that you were not aware of this but I am letting you know now. I hope that your anger on me will cease at some time and that you can constructively help me in future. Also you did not leave an edit summary on my talk page, plese do so in future, otherwise when I look in my contributions and see "STOP, STOP, STOP", I take this an inappropriate. Thanks a lot. :-) -- PoliMaster ^talk/_spy 09:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Nobody's buying it. We can see your talkpage history. I've asked you a number of times to stop. Don't give me this "...I was asking for help, saying "Hello, how are you?..." garbage. It's trolling and harrassment, plain and simple. Now stop PMing me and stay off my talk page. I want nothing to do with you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:59, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes and each and every time, I've been friendly and acted in a correct manner. Also for your information, all of my chats are logged, so I am able to disclose what we have said if you want and why you really behave like this towards me. Accepted, that you want nothing to do with me but I would like your definition of trolling which you seem to have averted.-- PoliMaster ^talk/_spy 10:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)