Talk:Cristina Odone

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

University of Oxford B‑class

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Journalism Unassessed

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

"Johann Hari suspended from the Independent following plagiarism row". Guardian News and Media. 12 July 2011. The latest allegations to surface in the past week relate to claims that Hari used a pseudonym to make unflattering edits to the Wikipedia entries for journalists including Nick Cohen, the Observer and Spectator columnist, and Daily Telegraph writer and novelist Cristina Odone.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Cristina Odone (11 July 2011). "I fell out with Johann Hari – then 'David Rose' started tampering viciously with my Wikipedia entry". The Daily Telegraph. At the same time, a mysterious person also started tampering with Hari's enemies' Wikipedia entries. Mine started featuring all kinds of inaccuracies: I had been embroiled in rows over my anti-semitism and homophobia (not true); I'd been fired from the Catholic Herald (not true). Tellingly, my Wiki entry also included a long description of how I had attacked Johann Hari. This struck me as curious: in a professional life that included encounters with Pope John Paul II, Tony Blair, Mother Teresa, Gordon Brown and Kingsley Amis, I didn't quite see why Hari merited a paragraph, and the rest didn't get a look in. I thought no more about it – until a "friend" of my mother's teased her about my Wikipedia entry.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Her Wikipedia article in the news

Enough reliable sources are covering Cristina Odone and her Wikipedia article that I think it's worthy of inclusion in the article itself. Not being a long-time editor of this article, I'm asking for other opinions. Here are just a few of the more mainstream mentions of the controversy:

"When he fell out with Hari, Cohen found that a certain “David r” had tinkered nastily with his Wikipedia entry; the same happened to Cristina Odone when she questioned the reliability of young Johann’s journalism." —The Telegraph
"Observer columist Nick Cohen and former New Statesman deputy editor Cristina Odone are among those who found their Wikipedia entries trashed by a user named "David r from Meth Productions" after disagreements with Hari, while Hari's own page remained spotless." —Huffington Post
"Odone, who had criticized Hari's work at the New Statesmen, also found that her Wikipedia page contained allegations that she was 'homophobe' and an 'anti-Semite' and "such a disastrous journalist that the Catholic Herald had fired her," Cohen reported. He continued: "Her husband, Edward Lucas, went online to defend her reputation, but 'David r from Meth Productions' tried to stop him. Mr 'r' gave the same treatment to Francis Wheen, Andrew Roberts and Niall Ferguson after they had spats with Hari. It didn't stop there. Lucas noticed that anonymous editors had inserted Hari's views on a wide range of people and issues into the relevant Wikipedia pages, while Hari himself had a glowing Wikipedia profile -- until the scandal broke, that is -- much of it written by 'David r'." —Huffington Post
"The latest allegations to surface in the past week relate to claims that Hari used a pseudonym to make unflattering edits to the Wikipedia entries for journalists including Nick Cohen, the Observer and Spectator columnist, and Daily Telegraph writer and novelist Cristina Odone." —The Guardian

First Light (talk) 15:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not significant enough for inclusion yet. When the person behind 'David r' is more decisively exposed, or admits to their behaviour, this might change. As it is, the inference that the individual responsible is Johann Hari gains a passing mention in that article in relation to his Indie suspension. Philip Cross (talk) 15:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving policy

I just noticed that the meat of the discussions are now really only available via the links Archive 1 and Archive 2 etc. this was NOT so just a week or so ago. I know archiving methodologies and this does not fit that. Maybe the contents of the archive deserve a wiki post in its own light ? Skthetwo (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The last entry on the third archive page is from August 2009. Comments on talk pages are normally archived after a month or ninety days at most. I have taken the liberty of moving your comments; it is also usual to start sections on talk pages in chronological order. Philip Cross (talk) 18:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's no policy on archiving discussions - those discussions form 2009 were pretty stale. If you want to revive them so they can be discussed again, you can. The Archive bot, which I added to this page, will automatically archive any discussion more than 180 days old. Anywhere from one month to six months is typical for the archive bots, depending on how many discussions are piling up. I would request that the discussion I began above be left for at least three months, since this page is otherwise empty, and because I think the issue needs some time to resolve itself. First Light (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]