User talk:Renseim

Leave messages for me below: Renseim (talk) 13:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Darcus Howe

Please stop adding uncited interpretations of his BBC interview to Darcus Howe; see WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:NPOV for reasoning. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:24, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying HARD not to say anything that isn't sourced including by the interview itself. I'm sincere. Please deal with the specifics (sentences) if you feel I've made a mistake in any sense. The latest version I posted is a bit stronger exactly because the Wash. Post article sources the fact of the criticisms (not just on youtube). Is that cool?? Renseim (talk) 20:29, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not cool. You are posting your on interpretation of the video, which is not a reliable source for the statements you are making. You're also edit warring; you've restored specific sentences once I've removed them. You don't appear to be an experienced editor; others will happily advise you, so please don't make further edits to that section until you've discussed them on the article's talk page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please also urgently make yourself familiar with WP:3RR. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:42, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well of course I restored sentences when I didn't think that they should have been removed, but if you'll point out the specific sentences (or simply edit them to correct a specific problem with them) then we can take it from there. Yes, I will deal with the talk page (I hadn't realized a discussion began there but was just looking at the edit summaries.). Yes I am familiar with the 3-R rule. Renseim (talk) 20:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]