Battle of Ganjgal
Battle of Ganjgal | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the War in Afghanistan (2001–present) | |||||
| |||||
Belligerents | |||||
Islamic Republic of Afghanistan | Taliban | ||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||
Maj. Kevin Williams | Unknown | ||||
Units involved | |||||
Task Force Chosin
| Taliban fighters | ||||
Strength | |||||
13 US Forces[1]
Approx 60 ANA | Approx 150[1] | ||||
Casualties and losses | |||||
US: 5 Killed[2] ANA: 8 Killed | Unknown |
The Battle of Ganjgal was a battle in the War in Afghanistan fought between US/Afghan forces and the Taliban in the Kunar Province on September 8, 2009.[2][1] Complaints that the coalition casualties were avoidable and caused by a failure of the chain of command to provide fire support for the team triggered an official investigation and a series of reprimands to several US military officers.[3] Former Marine Corporal Dakota Meyer is scheduled to receive the Medal of Honor for his actions during the battle. Once awarded the Medal he will be only the third living recipient since the Vietnam War.[4][5]
Background
On September 3 an Embedded Training Team (ETT) lead a combined group of Afghan Army and National Police forces on a patrol operation around Dam Dara, a village about a mile from Ganjgal. The villagers reacted cordially but the ETT and its Afghan allies took small arms fire upon leaving Dam Dara from a small group of men on a ridge outside the village. After the brief attack the village elders of nearby Ganjgal renounced the attackers and requested that the coalition forces return to their village to conduct a census of military age males and assist in the rebuilding of the local mosque. The original date of September 7th was pushed back by the ETT at last minute in order to ensure that their National Police forces were adequately prepared for the coming operation.[1]
Engagement
The following day, on September 8, an alternate Training Team, ETT 2-8, set out with their allied Afghan forces to Ganjgal. During their mission planning, it was made clear that no dedicated close air support would be available for the mission but commanders promised artillery support from nearby forward bases. In addition, ETT 2-8 was told that, in case of emergency, helicopter support could be redirected from an operation in a neighboring valley within five minutes.[6] Initial intelligence available to the team indicated that Taliban forces were aware of the pending mission and were setting up ambush positions within the village with a forward force of at least 20 fighters. Concerned with both losing the initiative and the safety of the anti-Taliban village elders, ETT 2-8 decided to proceed with the mission and engage the Taliban forces.[1]
Just after dawn, after inserting into the valley and approaching Ganjgal, the Task Force came under heavy machine gun, small arms and RPG fire from at least 100 entrenched Taliban fighters, far more than indicated was present by intelligence reports. The Task Force soon found itself pinned down in a three-sided ambush and being taunted over open radio channels by Taliban fighters.[6] Initial calls for artillery support were rejected by the command post due to new rules of engagement put in place by Stanley McChrystal in an effort to reduce civilian casualties. Both an Army artillery NCO and an Air Force Joint terminal attack controller took immediate action to provide the ambushed US-Afghan unit with fire support but were overruled by the command post.[3] ETT 2-8 informed their command post that they were not near the village but were again denied fire support. ETT 2-8 began calls for emergency helicopter support but the adjacent helicopter assets were tied up and taking fire in support of another operation.
The coalition forces were taking increasing fire and could observe women and children shuttling fresh ammunition to Taliban fighting positions. Within 30 minutes of making contact, the ETT called back to the command post to provide a artillery barrage of smoke canisters to cover their withdraw. Told that no standard smoke was available, the team requested white phosphorus rounds be used instead to screen their retreat. Nearly an hour later, the white phosphorus rounds landed and the coalition forces retreated under heavy fire a short distance before being pinned once again. By this time, three US Marines, their Navy Corpsman, their Afghan interpretor and several Afghan soldiers had been killed and an Army soldier in the ETT had sustained mortal wounds. Taliban snipers were moving into flanking positions when helicopter support arrived and began to attack Taliban positions. This arrival allowed the wounded to be pulled out and for three Marines to fight their way back up the hill to retrieve fallen comrades. By the time Task Force Chosin had totally disengaged, the firefight had lasted for nearly nine hours.[7]
The position occupied by the three dead Marines and the Navy corpsman had been overrun by the enemy, who stripped the bodies of their gear and weapons. The bodies were recovered after their comrades, including Meyer, braved enemy fire to return to the location.[8]
Aftermath
After the battle coalition forces speculated that elements within the Afghan National Police forces and local villagers had informed nearby Taliban forces of mission's timing and location. In addition an investigation was launched into the lack of requested fire and air support. While members of the task force publicly blamed McChrystal's new rules of engagement, which were also cited by personnel at the command post, the investigation placed most blame on the battalion leadership concluding it had been "negligent".[3] The investigation found that three US Army officers at nearby Forward Operating Base Joyce, from Task Force Chosin, a unit comprising soldiers from 1st Battalion, 32nd Infantry Regiment, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division, out of Fort Drum, N.Y, had exhibited "negligent leadership" which had directly contributed to the loss of life in the battle. Two of the three officers were given formal reprimands.[9]
Several members of ETT 2-8 were cited for valor with several Bronze Stars and a single Medal of Honor to be awarded to Meyer. Two Marines, Captain Ademola Fabayo, 30, and Staff Sergeant Juan Rodriguez-Chavez, 34, were awarded the Navy Cross for their actions during the battle.[10]
References
- ^ a b c d e Dan Lamothe. "Heroism in ambush may yield top valor awards". Marine Corps Times.
- ^ a b Dan Lamothe. "Rep. wants answers on Ganjgal ambush probe". Military Times.
- ^ a b c Dan Lamothe. "Report: Army denied aid to team under fire". Marine Corps Times.
- ^ Dan Lamothe. "Ambush survivor up for Medal of Honor". Navy Times.
- ^ Army News Service. "Army Ranger to be awarded Medal of Honor". Stars and Stripes.
- ^ a b Jonathan S. Landay. "'We're pinned down:' 4 U.S. Marines die in Afghan ambush". McClatchy.
- ^ Jonathan S. Landay. "Deadly Afghan ambush shows perils of ill-supplied deployment". McClatchy.
- ^ Lamothe, Dan, "Marines Receive Navy Cross For Ganjgal Heroics", Military Times, 10 June 2011.
- ^ Lamothe, Dan, "Marines Receive Navy Cross For Ganjgal Heroics", Military Times, 10 June 2011.
- ^ Lamothe, Dan, "Marines Receive Navy Cross For Ganjgal Heroics", Military Times, 10 June 2011.
External Links