User talk:Yabroq

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to El Hajeb has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. causa sui (talk) 07:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Map of List of countries by system of government

Hi Tachfin, I remarked you were able to edit maps. Therefore, may you edit this map [1] ? You would make Western Sahara white (disputed region) or gray (not following any of the systems of government in the article), and give Morocco a red color (as it recently turned into a parliamentary monarchy). It would be also be good if you removed the border between Kosovo and Serbia because Kosovo is an unrecognized country. Thanking you in advance, Zambitious (talk) 23:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I changed WS to represent both government's types (Morocco's and SADR's), changing it to white would have it mixed with the sea. I didn't change Morocco's colors since i don't think it is in the same category as UK & Spain yet. The king still retains control over the army, although i have to admit that putting it in the same category as the UAE & Bahrein is a little misleading. I didn't change Kosovo since it exercises control over the territory it claims despite being a state with limited international recognition.

If you wish to edit maps, you can download inkscape, it's free, light and easy to use once you get the vector image logic. Regards Tachfin (talk) 13:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Tachfin, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Tachfin/sandbox/Vandalism/Morocco. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.
Shut off the bot here.
Report errors here.
If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	for this contribution Dzlinker (talk) 19:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glad

Thanks a lot for those barnstars. Greatly appreciated!! (I once changed my username from S710 to S711, because I lost my password.) S711 (talk) 22:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You totally deserve it and more! (the password: It happened to me too :D old account User:Moroccan_sky)

Best regards --Tachfin (talk) 00:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Please do not vandalisme pages with false information without original sources (not imaginary). 87.217.106.39 (talk) 16:05, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, right --Tachfin (talk) 17:21, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote

I see you are moroccan ultra-nacionalist (because you erase all template countries and dynastys and for you all are Morocco).

I wrote you to vote in options! (almohad talk) Luciusmaximus (talk) 19:47, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Helloooooo Bokpasa!! :-D

Omar-Toons (talk) 20:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ceuta and Mellila

Morocco still claims Ceuta and Melilla and the Spanish islands off the coast. It even objects when a Spainsh minister visit these places, not to mention the King of Spain.

That Morocco still claims these places whether officialy or de facto, is very much clear, it even protested when King Juan Carlos visited one of the exclves in 2007, which a country that would not claim them, certainly would not.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.213.231.22 (talk) date

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia,

As I said Morocco doesn't claim Ceuta and Mellila officially (as in before the U.N) nor has this issue ever been a source of contention between the two countries in the last decades. Morocco's government spokesman said that he considers the visit by the Spanish king as a provocation. This kind of diplomatic remarks and comments about the issue are different from Officially claiming a territory. What sources say and what the government of Morocco has done is calls for negotiations on the status of the enclaves and that is very different from saying Spain should go and transfer sovereignty to us.--Tachfin (talk) 22:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Acoso

Bueno, te escribo en español, porque ya que lo vas a revertir pues así lo haces con motivos, puedes decirme ¿porqué fallan tanto tus escusas para eliminar mis contribuciones?, ¿te gusta revertir la historia?Bokpasa 23:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

I don't speak Spanish. --Tachfin (talk) 23:37, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Tachfin. Thank you.OpenInfoForAll (talk) 23:44, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of Morocco

Hello,

I reverted Dzlinker's edits and gave my opinion on Template talk:History of Morocco since he edited the template without consensus.

Feel free to give your opinion about that.

Omar-Toons (talk) 23:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Please stop Userboxes don't have to be NPOV: they usually aren't. This only applies to the article namespace. Please stop. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:27, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Really? It does, read your own link. To insinuate in anyway that the flag of a disputed territory is That of SADR or Morocco, is propaganda, political advocacy/recruitment--Tachfin (talk) 14:50, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes You can have any perspective you want on your userpage with a userbox--you need to stop manipulating these. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, not in the case of Wikiprojects, make a userbox in your user space, or change the Project's title.

If I were you, I wouldn't be accusing others of manipulating, considering your history. Avoiding such borderline personal attacks and self-righteous attitude (Me is right according to me) would be a good start for a discussion. --Tachfin (talk) 15:19, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No I'm not right according to me: see WP:UBX. Userboxes are (in part) for POV. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look, as per the above, usbx have restrictions read your own link. Add {{subst:user name_of_box}} or copy your prefered version into your user space. But The template being in the project's page and in template name space, as to insinuate that Western Sahara=SADR or Morocco, clearly un-acceptable political militancy (Again read your link)--Tachfin (talk) 15:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TfD If you don't like these, propose them for deletion--don't keep on changing the look on userpages. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:42, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OWN, add {{subst:user name_of_box}} if you don't want it to change on your userpage.--Tachfin (talk) 15:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly I didn't even make one of those--the alternative was made for users who want it. They can have that on their page if they want. If you think it should be userfied, then suggest that. The solution is not to change it to the version that you think is appropriate and create several redundant templates. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:48, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Those usbx are already redundant as they are, and more importantly politically charged. That wouldn't be a problem if they weren't featured on an official project page. --Tachfin (talk) 16:11, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spain are not Morocco

I wrote you because you wrote: ¿Ronda, Seville and Ceuta are part of Moroco?Luciusmaximus (talk) 20:26, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

First, I did not write that. The cities you mention are certainly part of Spain today, but weren't part of it or part of the kingdom of Castile at the times mentioned in the article you edited. Hope this will clarify.

Regards, --Tachfin (talk) 20:31, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Flag of Western Sahara (list of circulating currencies)

That sounds like a good idea. How does this entry look to you: Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (Western Sahara)? This is the same format on the list used for the Republic of China, which is commonly referred to as Taiwan. As for the currency, it seems that both the Moroccan dirham and the Sahrawi peseta are used, with the peseta being primarily a commemorative currency. Both can be listed under the same entry and a note can be made for the peseta's commemorative status. How does that sound? – Zntrip 22:32, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, just made some minor changes. See what you think of my bracketed version of the name. Sahrawi Republic, seems to be the short name and I put "Western Sahara" is parentheses. Please take a look, because I'm not sure if "Sahrawi Republic" is a commonly used name. – Zntrip 23:48, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]