Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Ecological light pollution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anotherdoon (talk | contribs) at 19:22, 22 August 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ecological light pollution

Created by Anotherdoon (talk). Self nom at 13:44, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Source and date of creation are good, but I suggest replacing "if" with "though" because there's no doubt that LEDs produce less light and "overall" with "than conventional forms of lighting" to provide context. Smokeybjb (talk) 03:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that even though LED street lighting produces less light than conventional forms of lighting, it can still cause more ecological light pollution?
As far as I know it really depends on the installation. Also, in former communist countries in the EU (particularly in rural areas) there is still a lot of 70's era lighting, and if that gets replaced by LEDs it's quite likely that the lights will be brighter. I like the change to the hook (somehow I forgot "conventional lighting"), but to be sure it's right everywhere (and to avoid a potential plug for the LED lighting industry on the front page) I would use the below. Anotherdoon (talk) 19:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
ALT2: ... that even when LED street lighting produces less light than conventional forms of lighting, it can still cause more ecological light pollution?