User talk:Koavf/Archive028
 User talk:Koavf archives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Please do not modify other users' comments or formatting.
I prefer if you respond on my talk page; I will respond on yours. Please let me know if you want otherwise.
By the way, I'm not an admin--once a month, I get a request for admin help. See WP:AN.
Albums with liner notes by Greil Marcus.
Your edit here is not referenced in the article. The original vinyl, nor the cassette copy, or the CD version of the album had ANY liner notes, other than a list of the musicians etc. There is nothing in the article to substantiate your claim that Greil Marcus wrote any liner notes for the album - or a few others you have tagged with this claim. Staying within the realms of semi-politeness, I can only describe some of your recent additions to WP as "mindless editing." If you are really interested in getting your edit count higher I suggest you look at your edits over the past few months and see which ones need undoing! --Richhoncho (talk) 10:22, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have checked the Dylan article and at no point is there a claim that Marcus did liner notes for Blonde on Blonde - or any other Dylan album, for that matter (although he did). It does also seem pertinent to check what the article says, which you have not done! And, yes, I wanted your edits brought to another's attention, how any other contributor to WP views your actions is another matter. You can respond here if you prefer, but I'd rather this was laid to rest now. I've said all I wish to say and have no intention of retracting anything. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- In which case the whole category is misleading and should be deleted. There are liner notes on SOME of the re-issues. Hardly noteable. --Richhoncho (talk) 11:26, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- Category now nominated for deletion.--Richhoncho (talk) 13:13, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- In which case the whole category is misleading and should be deleted. There are liner notes on SOME of the re-issues. Hardly noteable. --Richhoncho (talk) 11:26, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Ablums produced by Mike Vernon (producer)
Spot the typo :) I'd fix it, but it seems I can't. Regards, Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:35, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
AGF
I'll quote: "Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively. Just as one can incorrectly judge that another is acting in bad faith, so too can one mistakenly conclude that bad faith is being assumed, and exhortations to "Assume Good Faith" can themselves reflect negative assumptions about others if a perceived assumption of bad faith was not clear-cut." Your continued actions and the OTHER people's comments in the section give plenty of suggestions to support my assumption of your motives . . . which were not even part of the question I posed. This was not a personal attack. I didn't even name you in the comment, it was a passing statement to advance beyond to short term issue that had been resolved. Resolved with you being penalized for your misuse of the AWB tool, I will point out. Perhaps knowing what motivates your own actions, you protest too much. Trackinfo (talk) 00:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Regarding the quote, I believe care is being exercised. It was not my intention to besmirch you with heavy hand, but rather to draw on the negative implications of a poorly thought comment. To the extent mine was poorly thought, I apologize. My76Strat (talk) 01:04, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of The Big Day (album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Big Day (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Day (album) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 05:59, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Jews from Thessaloniki
Please explain why you created Category:Jews from Thessaloniki as a sub-cat of Category:Thessalonian Jews. Are they not one and the same? Chesdovi (talk) 10:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
ACC
Please don't break the wiki! ;) Protonk (talk) 20:26, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Photos
Lol, I thought Dan was the one who shot those! But you emailed them, so I got a bit puzzled. Thanks for correcting me! Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 00:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Well, it is important, though, to keep in mind that the subject of your work might not be public domain. Also, photos of living people require their consent, which is why stock photos of people tend to be of the same subjects over and over and why BLPs are such dangerous articles to put images in. But I'm glad to have met you as well! See you at the WEP summit in the summer, or before then, perhaps! Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 00:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Daniel Simanek (talk • contribs) 00:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
To the future -
Thanks for the note, Justin. I'd be happy for you to come by the museum on any Tuesday or Wednesday, if you're able, to touch base and just to allow us to host you for a fun visit (just couldn't be a whole collections tour.) We'd definitely like to keep you in the loop as we move forward with sharing more content. We need to gather up a solid contingency of helpers (even if everyone just does a little.) Also, there's talk of a city-wide Wikipedian-in-Residence position that we may need this fall in preparation for the super bowl. (Shhh... :) So keep that in mind. Thanks Justin! LoriLee (talk) 14:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Czechia (one-word name of the Czech Republic) resp. Name of the Czech Republic
On the basis of your recommendation below, i incorporated some information into Name of the Czech Republic article, that were (as in the case of the original article) completely (word by word) deleted without any discussion or notice by Mewulwe user. I think it is sufficient proof, that the war has been continued, but not from my side. As the incidence of deleting facts is so frequent, that nothing i write endures on the page longer that one hour, i hope you will understand, that my patience is over and i don´t need to feel paranoic, if i declare, that it is an arbitrary act of that user.
Edit-war It looks like your draft of this article has some good content, but I think it would be more better to incorporate that into Names of the Czech Republic rather than create an article for this term itself. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:14, 18 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neewi (talk • contribs)
Link breaking
In this edit you broke links to three audio files, which have all consequently been deleted as unused fair-use files. Similarly in this edit. Presumably there are many similar edits that I haven't come across yet. Please could you fix the links that you have broken, and get the files undeleted (e.g., at WP:REFUND). --Zundark (talk) 13:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Albums by liner notes author
Now at nominated for deletion. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 16:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Asian Europe.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asian Europe.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 23:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
New categories
Hello Koavf, we're a little confused by some of your new categories/application—please could you comment here? TIA, Uniplex (talk) 08:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)