Talk:Fred Shero
Appearance
Fred Shero has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Nickname
Putting nickname and source here for future use in prose. The Fog[1] -Djsasso (talk) 20:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Fred Shero/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: intelatitalk 06:40, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
The bolded things need attention.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Well referenced, and no synthesis
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Well written, and easy to understand. even for a hockey n00b
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- yep
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Hmmm... My first two GA nominations have little to no pictures. :/
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- I like pretty pictures, so can you find a team photo or something like that?
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Just a nitpicky thing, the "Personal life" seems a little small. can you expand on it?
- Pass/Fail:
- I expanded the personal life section, as for the pictures I searched through Flickr and emailed a couple of users one didn't want to change the licensing the other one, who had a picture of the team that looked to be a photo taken by a no-professional (which makes me think they might hold the copy rights), but they have not responded and I doubt they will at this point. I don't know where else to find free images and I think that attempting to add it under fair use would fail Contextual significance. "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding."--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 04:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'll pass this one. --intelatitalk 17:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- I expanded the personal life section, as for the pictures I searched through Flickr and emailed a couple of users one didn't want to change the licensing the other one, who had a picture of the team that looked to be a photo taken by a no-professional (which makes me think they might hold the copy rights), but they have not responded and I doubt they will at this point. I don't know where else to find free images and I think that attempting to add it under fair use would fail Contextual significance. "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding."--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 04:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- ^ "Risky moves have paid off for Penguins". Associated Press. 2008-05-07. Retrieved 2008-05-07.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- GA-Class Manitoba articles
- Low-importance Manitoba articles
- GA-Class Canadian sport articles
- Low-importance Canadian sport articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Ice Hockey articles
- GA-Class Philadelphia Flyers task force articles
- WikiProject Ice Hockey biographical articles