Jump to content

Talk:Fred Shero

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Djsasso (talk | contribs) at 15:04, 25 August 2011 (update ice hockey parameters using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleFred Shero has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 24, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
November 19, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Nickname

Putting nickname and source here for future use in prose. The Fog[1] -Djsasso (talk) 20:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Fred Shero/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: intelatitalk 06:40, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

The bolded things need attention.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    All Good
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Well referenced, and no synthesis
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Well written, and easy to understand. even for a hockey n00b
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    yep
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    No edit wars
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Hmmm... My first two GA nominations have little to no pictures. :/
I like pretty pictures, so can you find a team photo or something like that?
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just a nitpicky thing, the "Personal life" seems a little small. can you expand on it?
I expanded the personal life section, as for the pictures I searched through Flickr and emailed a couple of users one didn't want to change the licensing the other one, who had a picture of the team that looked to be a photo taken by a no-professional (which makes me think they might hold the copy rights), but they have not responded and I doubt they will at this point. I don't know where else to find free images and I think that attempting to add it under fair use would fail Contextual significance. "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding."--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 04:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll pass this one. --intelatitalk 17:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "Risky moves have paid off for Penguins". Associated Press. 2008-05-07. Retrieved 2008-05-07.