User talk:Xiaoyu of Yuxi

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of August 2011.

Firstly, the administrators (sysops). When an organisation allows for even one person of authority to fail to serve as a great example to others, e.g. when that person displays a poor temperament, it reflects poorly on that organisation. When the admins of an organisation vet for those independence-minded persons (I am talking about what occurred in early December 2010 at the Taiwan article...such activists deserve to be terminated with extreme prejudice) who go about disrupting articles inserting their bogus POV over those who enforce a strict standard of neutrality, I can be part of that organisation no more.

Secondly, although I prefer working in quiet, my efforts over the past 5 months regarding mentioning the mere existence of towns, townships, etc. have not been appreciated or recognised enough. There is something drastically wrong when coverage of miscellaneous topics far exceeds coverage of administrative divisions that house tens of millions (e.g. almost all articles on mainland settlements or political divisions).

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly adding CSD G7 tags to articles in which you were involved, in spite of being requested to stop. If you wish to vanish, see the instructions at WP:VANISH. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Xiaoyu of Yuxi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not warned (at 19:37) by Amatulic until 4 minutes after I added the last tag (at 19:33). Thus I was not directly notified in spite of what Amatulic claims. Lastly, I do not intend to resume editing after tonight, and, after Amatulic's notification, have realised what WP:VANISH does, so this sanction is not at all necessary to prevent any disruption, so to speak. —Xiaoyu: 聊天 (T) 和 贡献 (C) 20:18, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

My apologies. After I left the notice on your talk page, I saw you remove it and then I saw more articles you tagged in the speedy deletion queue, so I blocked you to prevent further tagging. Sorry for the misunderstanding. As I said earlier, if you want to WP:VANISH, a bureaucrat can facilitate this for you without deleting your articles. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]