User talk:Oldwildbill
| This is Oldwildbill's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2 |
{{WPMILHIST}}
Just a minor note on something I noticed: the extremely broad core topics (e.g. Military) really shouldn't be tagged with every possible task force, as most of those are quite irrelevant to the actual content of the article. It's generally better, in such cases, to have no task forces listed than to have all of them. ;-)
Thanks! Kirill Lokshin 05:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but my point was that the true core topics couldn't really be considered "in the scope" of, say, a national task force, because one wouldn't expect any meaningful connection between the content of the article and the task force's scope. The question I tend to ask in such cases might be "Is a potential editor of the article likely to need/want/get any significant assistance with it via that particular task force" (more so than simply through the central project, anyways). Thus, for example, there's no real reason why an editor of Military would want to consult with, say, the Canadian military history task force—the connection is just too limited.
- (At a certain point, of course, the overuse of task force tags just looks bad—we don't want to give the impression that we're spamming, after all.)
- Now that we have the "Military science" and "Military technology and engineering" task forces, things should be a bit easier, incidentally. "Military science", in particular, is probably the one that a lot of central topics should be tagged into. Kirill Lokshin 22:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Latin America (under some name) is one that's been the subject of considerable discussion, but we haven't been able to settle on whether we want "Latin America", "South America", "South and Central America", or some other variation as the scope (it having turned out that there are national sensibilities at stake). I'm hoping that we'll be able to come to some decision on the issue in the near future, though, as it's a pretty major gap in our coverage. Kirill Lokshin 22:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Request
Hey my buddy, how have you been? I would like you to take a look at the image of Rear Admrial Rafael Celetino Bemitez Image:Rear Admiral R.C. Benitez.jpg. Now, notice his Silver Star ribbon below his "Sub Wings". If I'm not mistaken, he was awarded more then one Silver Star Medal. What do you think? Tony the Marine 05:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
MyRevolutionaryWar.com
Were you referring to the massive linkspam I helped removed earlier this week to www.myrevolutionarywar.com? I was told by an admin, Eagle 101, to remove it. I don't recall his exact wording, but I have logs at home, I believe. We caught it, as we're testing a new bot to catch linkspam through RC patrol. If you'd like, you can check it out on irc.freenode.net #wikipedia-spam and #wikipedia-spam-t. Note that the bot does not actually do any reversion itself, but rather notifies us of any linkspam or red-/black-listed sites added to en.wiki and notifies flesh-and-blood editors of possible abuse.
I'd don't recall his exact reasoning for saying to remove it, but I'll check when I get home after my Environmental Management course tomorrow. I don't have a fast enough connection here to look through all my reverts for it, but I'll check when I get home tomorrow (Marketing class until 9:00pm tonight, work at 6:00am tomorrow morning, PST of course). If I inadvertantly removed any other links, I appologize. Please feel free to readd them, as they would have been inadvertantly removed. Thanks for contacting me instead of just simply re-adding them... it's greatly appreciated. :) thadius856talk 00:37, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Like I said before, I don't recall the admin's reasoning — you'd be better off contacting him about that aspect of it. However, I do recall that the link was added to roughly 25 pages in very fast succession, all identical, indicating copy & paste action.
- I personally don't have any feelings either way about the site, so I won't be adding my two cents into the discussion. Hopefully everybody comes to an easily agreeable solution without too much infighting, as I'd hate to see WPMILHIST itself suffer because of the link removal. If you need to ask me anything else, feel free to contact me again on my talk page again. thadius856talk 19:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Just wondering
How are you and what you've up to lately? Take care Buddy. Tony the Marine 23:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Glad to hear from you. I need your opinion. Even thogh I stated in the article that I wrote that Admiral Benitez was the recipient of two Silver Star Medals, I would like you to take a look at the image of Rear Admrial Rafael Celetino Bemitez Image:Rear Admiral R.C. Benitez.jpg. Now, notice his Silver Star ribbon below his "Sub Wings" (You can zoom it). I just want to make sure that my eyes aren't playing tricks on me. Tell me what you think? Tony the Marine 19:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Reguesting your opinion
Someone wants to rename the Categories of the Legion of Merit, Purple Heart, Silver Star and Bronze Star Medals, to something like this: "Category:Recipients of the United States Purple Heart medal".
I personally oppose this move because these military decorations are only awarded om the United States and therefore cannot be confused with some other country's decoration. I see no need for the move. As a person who has been involved with United States military related articles, I invite you to express your opinion here: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy. Thank you, Tony the Marine 02:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
My old buddy
Man, am I glad to hear from you. I'm also very happy to see that you are back and well. I'll be going to Powder Springs, Georgia for 5 days starting tomorrow. When I get back I'll get in touch with you because I have a fantastic story to tell you. Tell you what, send me an e-mail right now and I'll send you the story. Tony the Marine 07:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
HMS A1
I know it's been a year and a half, but I finally completed your request for illustrations for HMS A1, with not one - but two images I found in a 1904 edition of the "Review of Reviewers for Australasia". Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 07:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
New! BCAD drive from Milhist
Can I invite you to particpate in our new assessment drive? It's strictly for experienced editors and has a degree of friendly competition built-in. It involves re-evaluating around 3500 Milhist B-Class articles to ensure they match our new criteria. As ever, we're offering a range of awards as our way of expressing our thanks. The drive doesn't start until 18:00 (UTC) on March 10 but you can sign up in advance here. It would be great if you can spare the time, --ROGER DAVIES talk 05:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
-
One Stripe (200 articles) -
Two Stripes (400 articles) -
Three Stripes (600 articles) -
Chevrons (1000 articles) -
Golden Wiki First place
-
News! Tag & Assess 2008 is coming ...
Milhist's new drive – Tag & Assess 2008 – goes live on April 25 and you are cordially invited to participate. This time, the task is housekeeping. As ever, there are awards galore, plus there's a bit of friendly competition built-in, with a race for bronze, silver and gold wikis! You can sign up, in advance, here. I look forward to seeing you on the drive page! All the best, --ROGER DAVIES talk 13:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
-
One Stripe (200 articles) -
Two Stripes (400 articles) -
Three Stripes (600 articles) -
Tireless Contributor Barnstar (1000 articles) -
Chevrons (2000 articles) -
Working Man's Barnstar (3000 articles) -
Barnstar of Diligence (4000 articles) -
Third place overall -
Second place overall -
First place overall
-
Thank you
Thank you very much indeed for your help with and commitment to Tag & Assess 2008. May I please trouble you to comment at the post-drive workshop? Your feedback will help us to improve the next drive. Thanks in advance, --ROGER DAVIES talk 10:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals |
|
|
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC) | |
Happy Thanksgiving
Happy Thanksgiving Tony the Marine (talk), 25 November 2010
Invitation to join WikiProject United States
 |
Hello, Oldwildbill! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!! |
--Kumioko (talk) 04:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
| |||
The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
|
The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
|
The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
|
May 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
. --Kumioko (talk) 15:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Article on William Harbison
Hi Oldwildbill. Thank you for your comments on the William Harbison article. I responded on the Talk Page. Skeet Shooter (talk) 11:05, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Oldwildbill. I saw your response and thank you for the review, update, and suggestions. Skeet Shooter (talk) 18:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
|
The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
|
SS Empire Deed
Hi, whilst I know that WP:MILHIST does not currently use C class, and thus a C Class article would show as Start class, I'm a bit mystified as to why you think the article does not meet the criteria for Structure. IMHO, the article only fails on B2, as there are large gaps in the history of the ship. My policy is that I don't self-assess articles (only). Would you consider re-assessment of the article against all five criteria please? Mjroots (talk) 09:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- You reckon that it's too detailed for WWII then? As part of the overall coverage of Empire ships, or indeed any large class of ships, some ships histories will be well documented, and others no so well documented. In some cases, part of a ships history will be well documented and others not so well documented, as in this case. Where detailed history can be discerned, we should record that. Sometimes, it all comes together nicely, per SS Empire Defender - the only major piece of information missing from that article is the Code Letters used by Hadiotis. Hopefully the Plimsoll Ship Data website containing scans of Lloyd's Registers from 1930-45 will be back online sometime, as the info is certain to be listed there. Mjroots (talk) 10:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- How about you make the edits you think will improve the article, then I raise any issues after you've done that. Forget the fact that I'm an admin, this is not a matter that requires administrative attention and I wouldn't sanction any editor for making good-faith attempts to improve something. No doubt I've written many articles that could be pushed to GA status, apart from the nine that I have got that far. I find that GAs do tend to take up a fair bit of time though, which could possibly be better spent in article creation. Mjroots (talk) 10:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, there's no rush. I'll know when you've edited the article via my patent method of watching articles I've contributed to. No good editing when you're tired, so when you're ready will be fine. Mjroots (talk) 11:12, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- How about you make the edits you think will improve the article, then I raise any issues after you've done that. Forget the fact that I'm an admin, this is not a matter that requires administrative attention and I wouldn't sanction any editor for making good-faith attempts to improve something. No doubt I've written many articles that could be pushed to GA status, apart from the nine that I have got that far. I find that GAs do tend to take up a fair bit of time though, which could possibly be better spent in article creation. Mjroots (talk) 10:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
June 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumioko (talk) 22:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
US National Archives collaboration
 |
United States National Archives WikiProject |
|---|---|
|
Regions
Hello. You have a new message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Strategy's talk page. Message added 18:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC).
The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
|
July 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumioko (talk) 13:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Block?
Blocked, why plus the time for the autoblock has expired even tho it wasn't this user that caused the autoblock.Oldwildbill (talk) 19:09, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oldwildbill (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 147.71.3.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jason.alexander4421". The reason given for Jason.alexander4421's block is: "Vandalism-only account".
- Blocking administrator: Horologium (talk • blocks)
Accept reason: I'm temporarily granting you IP block exemption but please read the following template. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:24, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.
Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.
Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).
I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:24, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
|
September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.