User talk:RohilPCS

Hi, I see you've been here a while, doing some nice work on foreign relation articles. I noticed you created People's Republic of China-Islamic Republic of Iran relations, but it was almost an exact copy of People's Republic of China – Iran relations, so I turned it into a redirect. Did you mean to do something else? Let me know if you need any help.

Whilst I'm here, have a belated welcome message - I'm afraid a lot of it's aimed at completely new editors, but some of the links might be useful. --Physics is all gnomes (talk) 23:50, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RohilPCS! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Physics is all gnomes (talk) 23:50, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Reversion

Your last edit to List of current and future lunar missions is vandalism and has been reverted.--119.153.96.20 (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Foreign relations of South Africa

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads and users who repeatedly upload or misuse non-free images may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 15:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Known and Unknown: A Memoir, you may be blocked from editing. Removing Hanson's review because you don't like Hanson or Rumsfeld is a violation of Wikipedia's NPOV policy. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:03, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to India–Palestine relations, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lihaas (talk) 17:20, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy Theory

In the future, if you want to send me a message about something, and bring up my name, then post it to my talk page and not the article's edit summary like you did with Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura‎. Thanks. Cyberia23 (talk) 06:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Srebrenica genocide

RohilPCS, I have no disagreement with your comments about Geller, but the point is that the reference to her you deleted is part of the overall treatment of the people who for one reason or another refuse to accept the facts or the description of genocide in relation to Srebrenica. The person who included her was identifying her position, not supporting it. Geller is not alone as a right-wing Islamophobe - I think it tells us something that Srebrenica often provides a vehicle for their Islamophobia and the contradiction of values they claim to espouse. Denial exists (though fortunately less strongly than it did in the past when there were long battles over this section of the Srebrenica article). It's informativetgo see how That's why it's important to identify the deniers, set out the basis of the denial and look at the defects in the argument, rather than just pretend they don't exist.Opbeith (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 10 Downing Street. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Reactions to the International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Kosovo's declaration of independence, you may be blocked from editing. --Avala (talk) 00:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]