Talk:Payback period
Business Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
advantages
- easy to calculate
- easy to understand
disadvantages
- ignores what is happening after the payback period
- ignores the value of money
- ignores profitability as it takes into consideration cash inflows
- it does not state the actual value of the project
The title
It has been proposed in this section that Payback period be renamed and moved to Pay-back period. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Payback period → Pay-back period – Adville (talk) 19:35, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
I wonder if the headline is correct. according to [The Oxford Dictionary of Economics] it should be "pay-back period" (while it in my Swedish book about economics is written "pay back metod" (but to get the correct term I prefere Oxford).
It could be a redirect from this page to the oxford-spelling, but I do not want to interfere in the enwp in these matters as I do not know your rules for that. Adville (talk) 12:29, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Oxford doesn't rule Britain, and Britain doesn't rule the world. Many Oxfordian spellings are not commonly used in Britain, while many British spellings are not used outside of Britain, and Commonwealth English isn't the only form of English in the world. "payback period"[1] is used in the world. 70.49.125.226 (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2011 (UTC)