User talk:Essexmutant

Introduction

Please leave Talk messages on this page. I will respond as soon as I can.

For further information about me, please see User:Essexmutant.

My Talk archive is located at User_talk:Essexmutant/Archive.

This user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgements About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are In Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They are Deletionist

The motto of the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD is Est omnino difficile judicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopaedia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopaediam dedecet, which translates to, "it is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia." This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

Please leave Talk messages here

Phil Ivey Second Place Razz Finish Source

http://www.pokerpages.com/tournament/result7866.htm. PokerPages is a very reliable poker site.

I see what you've done now

re the Devilfish addition. I'm new to Wikipedia. I still think it's a more plausible account of how the nickname was arrived at than the version in the main text, though.

Why did you delete my alternative nickname theory for Dave Ulliott?

Was it that I didn't ask first, or that the account about the Devilfish's nickname is not attributed to any named person? I find it more plausible than the one currently posted.

Prince of nothing

I had very good reasons for deleting the content in the Prince of Nothing entry - the information is plagiarized and not relevant unless you are actually reading the books already. I noted this in the talk page, and I'm willing to work on improving the article - but in the meantime, copying the book's appendix isn't much help to people who are just investigating the series. Rycanada 23:23, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(note to self: responded) Essexmutant 23:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, just new to Wikipedia, will learn more about edit summaries. Rycanada 23:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New V pages

These need other eyes than mine, would you be willing to take a look? After hacking through massive amounts of bad grammar and POV, I can't look at them for a while.

(Please respond on either way on the V talk page or my talk page.)

Lady Aleena 10:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Note to self - responded on Lady Aleena's talk page.) Essexmutant 10:02, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:) Note from Aleena - Thank you for your willingness to go through them. As I said, I can't look at them right now. I am actually sick of looking at them after spending 2-3 days looking over the same words over and over and over again editting them in a text editor. I will take a look at your changes after a few days away from them I think. If you find anything that needs drastic changes, however, please let me know.

(Lady Aleena's talk page) Lady Aleena 10:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the support vote and the congratulations on my adminship. Good luck with yours, looks like it'll go through no problem. CTOAGN (talk) 12:13, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Poker Royale

(replying from User_talk:TonicBH)

Unfortunately, I do not have much information on the results of the series. Doing some internet searches COULD give you some help, but I think the closest we can really get is watching the episodes in question. Thankfully the show reruns during late night hours. -TonicBH 15:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Chamberlain

Please keep an eye on the article, if possible. Some people add unsourced "facts" that bear badly on Ms Chamberlain's reputation. David.Monniaux 15:21, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin

Congratulations, you're an admin. Please check out the free advice, and enjoy the new means of contribution now available to you. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 17:55, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, congratulations! It's definitely deserved, and I'm sure you'll rock. Proto||type 11:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your new responsibilities. This will hopefully motivate you to work even harder on Wikipedia. Good Luck! S iva1979^{Talk to me} 12:02, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from me too. --kingboyk 12:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Mushroom (Talk) 15:41, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

grats. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 18:51, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats! Well done!--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 03:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User_talk:206.180.153.74

Sorry about that. Didn't realize that was the policy. It irks me everytime I go to that page and see the names linked in some places but not others. The rules are the rules though, so my apologies and thanks for fixing my "fixings."

Out of curiosity, am I the first to do that to that page, or do noobs like myself come and edit that often?

Congrats on the adminship, by the way.

Thanks

File:Plunger 250x410.jpg

Thanks for taking the time to vote in my RfA, which passed with a final vote of 54/2/1 despite my obvious inadequacy for the job. I'll do my level best to use the mop and bucket — or, as I said in my RfA, plunger — responsibly. Of course, in the best tradition of politicans everywhere, I've already broken a campaign promise and blocked a vandal (after I said "I don't anticipate using the blocking tool very often"). Nevertheless, I'll try not to let the unbridled power corrupt me. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 14:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Benyamine

Your welcome for thanking me for helping you become an admin. The picture of David I got from that website does not say to use their images with permission. Feel free to use another one, but I just wanted to clarify. The Eye of Timaeus 00:39, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

: )

Congrats, and good luck! User:Adrian/zap2.js 06:23, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Phil Collins

Just a quick thank you again for your vote of support for Phil Collins during its FAC review. I just learned that it won its nomination. (For the final results, see [[1]]). Thank you again for taking the time to review it. --Ataricodfish 06:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for saving my page!

I appreciate how you worked to save my user page, I really appreciate it. - User:VanillaX 23:13 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks from me as well. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 23:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

congratulations

congratulations for adminship--Ugur Basak 12:08, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Thank you!
Hello Essexmutant, and thank you for your support in my request for adminship! It passed with a final count of 98/2/0. If there is anything I can do to help you, please leave me a message on my talk page! -- xaosflux ^Talk

Coronation Street

I know you said earlier in the year that you wanted to start work on making this a good article again, so I'm wondering why nothing came of it. If you're still interested in doing the job, I'd like to collaborate (but I can't do much since I'm rather busy with school). Mike H. That's hot 23:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thanks for your vote

My request for adminship passed with a final result of 78/2/0. Hopefully I will live up to everyone's expectations. Please ask if I can ever help out with anything in the future.
Martyman - 09:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome and the help

I find Wikipedia's dozens of different licenses for pictures to be very confusing. Sucker straight 14:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for your support of my request for adminship. I'm delighted that the RfA ultimately succeeded with a final consensus of 52/1/0, so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any comments regarding my editing, or I can help you at any point in the future, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Again, thank you!

_└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 10:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Thank you for supporting me in my successful RFA. The admin tools will definitely be useful for dealing with vandalism more swiftly. Please drop a note on my talk page, should you have questions about any of my actions. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 02:03, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

With apologies for the impersonal AWB-ness of the message... Thanks for your support on my recent request for adminship. It passed at 91/1/0, and I hope I can continue to deserve the community's trust. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you, and if I make a mistake be sure to tell me. My talk page is always open. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I just wanted to say thank you for voting for my RFA, of course if you ever need a hand, let me know :) - cohesion★talk 23:10, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thank you for supporting my successful Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Raven4x4x request for adminship. I'll try to put the admin tools to good and responsible use. If I do anything wrong you know where to find me. Raven4x4x 07:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting on my RfA, it passed with a final tally of 68/0/0 so I'm now an administrator. If there's anything I can do to help, you feel I've done something wrong, or there's just something you want to tell, don't hesitate to use my talk page. Thanks. - Bobet 10:30, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi! Thanks for your support in my request for adminship (did you know that "adminiship" is not an English word? Unbelievable!). It ended with a tally of (51/0/0). As an administrator, I hope to better help this project and its participants: if you have any question or request, please let me know. - Liberatore(T) 12:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support

rƒa · ɐƒɹ

Thank you for supporting me in my request for adminship! It ended with a tally of 39/5/4, and I am now an admin. I'm glad to have earned the trust of the community, and I will make use of it responsibly. Of course, you can let me know of any comments or concerns you have.

With a million articles in front of me, I'd better get mopping.

rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 05:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you!
Hi Essexmutant, thank you for your support in my Rfa! It passed with a final tally of 86/0/0. If you need help or just want to talk let me know! Again, thank you! – Dakota ~ ° 21:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC) [reply]

My RfA

Thank you for your constructive critisizm during my RfA! It has decided to postpone making me an administrator based upon recent consensus (or lack thereof). Thanks for the kind remarks and I hope to continue to see you around the project. Cheers, Zsinj^Talk 08:37, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Thank you!
Thank you for your support in my recent RFA. It passed 53/1/2 and I am now an administrator. I appreciate that some of you made exceptions to your usual requirements re length of service and so on because we've interracted positively in the past, or because of my credentials, so I will endeavour to use my new mop cautiously. I'm always open to feedback and gently constructive criticism. If you're not an admin and need some assistance do of course please let me know. Thanks again --kingboyk 00:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC) [reply]

P.S. If you are interested in The Beatles, User:Lar has asked me to tag on a little note advertising the creation of a new Beatles WikiProject that we are currently setting up. Please sign up and help.

RfA/Christopherlin

Thanks for taking the time on my recent RfA. It went without consensus (22/11/8). I understand the caution you showed in voting neutrally, but I hope that next time I'm up I'll have your support. --Christopherlin 17:43, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Nomination for adminship for (aeropagitica)

Hello! Thank you for taking the time to vote for me in my recent request for adminship It ended with a final score of (40/10/5). I value all of the contributions made during the process and I will take a special note of the constructive criticism regarding interacting with users in the user talk space. If you have questions or requests, please leave a message. (aeropagitica) 16:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (66/2/3), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! Stifle 17:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

This user thinks it is ironic that thanks for supporting Cyde's successful RFA came in the form of a userbox.

Here's a userbox for you. --Cyde Weys 04:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

I'm leaving this macrophage, a particularly hungry white blood cell on your talk page, I just finished a rewrite of its article and realized they're not so different from administrators, as they keep their surroundings clean, doing away with anything that's not supposed to be there...
Anyway, with that short lecture on cell biology done with, I'd like to thank you for your vote on my RfA, which passed with (49/2/0), I'll do my best to not let you down, and if you see me heading towards a common newbie mistake, please nudge me in the right direction :)

--Obli (Talk)^? 20:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JDoorjam's RfA

Thank you!
Hey Essexmutant, thank you for your support in my RfA: it passed with a final tally of 55/1/2. If you want a hand with anything, please gimme a shout. Again, thanks! – JDoorj a m Talk 21:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC) [reply]

My RfA

Hey Essexmutant, how is it going? Thank you for supporting my Request for adminship! It passed with a final vote of 73/1/1, which means that I have been granted adminship! I look forward to using these tools to enhance and maintain this wonderful site. I will continue regular article/project contributions, but I will also allocate a sizable portion of my wikischedule toward administrative duties :) Thanks again, and if you have any questions/comments/tips, please let me know! — Deckiller 04:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi Mutant. My goodness, you get a lot of these! I thought long and hard about bucking the trend, but decided in the end to make this vulture-themed message. Admins are sort of like vultures, cleaning things up and whatnot... well, as long as you don't think too much about it. Anyway, I wanted to thank you for taking the time to consider my RfA, which passed this morning. If there's ever anything I can help you with, just ask; you know where to find me. ×Meegs 06:20, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thanks for your support in my RfA. It passed, with a final tally of 62/0/1. I'm touched by all the kind comments it attracted, and hope I'll be of some use with my new tools. You know where I am if you need to shout at me. Flower party■ 15:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thank you for your recent vote on my RFA. While the nomination failed, I was rather expecting it due to the big lapse between registration and recent edits. Anywho, if you have any suggestions as to how I could improve so as to hopefully succeed next time, please let me know! Thanks! —akghetto ^talk 07:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]