User talk:Sheep 2009

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Zoë Carpenter, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. W93 (talk) 21:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucien Laviscount

A tag has been placed on Lucien Laviscount requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Basket of Puppies 22:25, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamie Belman

A tag has been placed on Jamie Belman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 00:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. W93 (talk) 21:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Lydia Hart, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. W93 (talk) 18:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. W93 (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Dot Branning. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. W93 (talk) 01:31, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of minor Coronation Street characters (2007). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. HappyInGeneral (talk) 01:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elliot James Langridge

The article Elliot James Langridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, not exactly of any importance and it's irrelevant.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. W93 (talk) 15:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article List of EastEnders characters, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Whoniverse93 (talk) 23:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Lofty Holloway. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of Hollyoaks characters. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Whoniverse93 (talk) 21:07, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Hannah Ashworth has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 01:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steph Cunningham

Hello. I noticed you changed the date of her first appearance, if there a reference proving this?RAIN the ONE (Talk) 20:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi they was article on Digital Spy abaout this.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 17:59, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You need to add references when changing info, for Gaz you need to add one. I am aware he posted a status on Facebook, but we can't use that. If you could try and find one though?RAIN the ONE (Talk) 20:29, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry i will next time thanks.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 20:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Leave and Return (2010-2011) and Leaving Permanently (2012)

In June 2010 i left Wikipedia due to Collage work and i returned on 10 September 2010 after 3 months away.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 14:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 December 2010 I will leave and my friend will take over.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 18:51, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NOSHARE. He or she must create his or her own account. AnemoneProjectors 20:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I told her that she has to make her own and she agreed, but i am still keeping mine but nobody else will use this . Sorry for that.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 23:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok, will you not be returning? AnemoneProjectors 01:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yes but ill be takeing at least 6-8 months out is i am moving over to Canada early 2011 but i am not sure if i would be able to use my account over there, hopefuly i can.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 01:08, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok, good luck with the move. AnemoneProjectors 02:08, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 13:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"On 10 March 2011 I did my 1,300 edit" - you know it's only February don't you? –anemoneprojectors– 20:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yes i got it wrong sorry.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 18:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided that in 2012 i will finish editing on Wikipedia, the date might be around September/October 2012.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 09:22, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rob Norbury

A tag has been placed on Rob Norbury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

This is your only warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Becky McDonald, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You know the drill by now, don't add if it hasn't been confirmed, plus you didn't cite the available ref that is speculating her departure... RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 17:30, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not continue to change dates on Nicole Walker. The actress left the show from 2006 to 2008. Rm994 (talk) 17:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

they are grate Sheep 2009 (talk) 18:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for disruption or harassment on user pages. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 19:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sheep 2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to unblock my account with Wikipedia due to me not doing anything wrong my friend was messing around on my laptop Sheep 2009 (talk) 1:01 pm, Today (UTC+10)

Decline reason:

Please see WP:BROTHER. Either you did make these edits and thus are being untruthful, or someone else made these edits on your account, thus making it compromised. In either situation, we cannot unblock you. Note to admins: This seemed to be such a clear-cut decline that I don't see an issue with doing it, but feel free to override it if you feel otherwise. Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 04:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC) [reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Normally non-admins shouldn't decline unblock requests, but in this particular case, I agree, so consider it an admin decline by me. Courcelles 04:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I really did not do this and I don't deserve to be blocked because of something some else did and it would not happen again has I will log out next time i am not using Wikipedia, i just think i deserve a second chance has i am am innocent of doning nothing wrong}}--Sheep 2009 (talk) 10:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

appeal this block Unblock {{unblock|reason='I really did not do this and I don't deserve to be blocked because of something some else did and it would not happen again has I will log out next time i am not using Wikipedia, i just think i deserve a second chance has i am am innocent of doning nothing wrong}}