User talk:Bulgakoff

Image copyright problem with Image:M-A Fog.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:M-A Fog.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:M-A Fog.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:M-A Fog.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:M-A_Fog.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:M-A_Fog.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tormentor

thanks for changing it, i wasnt sure because i thought that bearing in mind that he plans to help infernus i wasnt sure what the implications of that was cos i know he has been involved in projects with both gaahl and infernus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpmuscillo (talk • contribs) 22:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

also, is sykelig not going to be touring with the band in future? 84.65.195.202 (talk) 11:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gaahl told me that Sykelig won't be touring with them anymore. Bulgakoff (talk) 19:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough, i think sykelig was just doing em a favour but hes got his own band.--Gpmuscillo (talk) 17:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 09:05, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Demo 2002

I have nominated Demo 2002, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo 2002 (3rd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? B. Wolterding (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Demo 2002 (Orcustus album)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Demo 2002 (Orcustus album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo 2002 (3rd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? B. Wolterding (talk) 16:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One of your images for Commons?

Hello. Sorry for my poor English... I would very mutch like to use the Image:Frost live with 1349.jpg at Swedish wikipedia, for the article on Frost. I saw that you are the photographer. Could you consider to upload the photo at Commons too? That would be very nice. BiblioteKarin (talk) 21:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) BiblioteKarin (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Tormentorbw.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tormentorbw.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous. All this info is in the image description page already. I took this photo personally, no matter what some other use might believe or not. Bulgakoff (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Forces of Satan Records artists

I have nominated List of Forces of Satan Records artists, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Forces of Satan Records artists. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. OlEnglish ^(Talk) 11:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Orcustus logo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Orcustus logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:21, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Demo 2002 (Orcustus album)

I have nominated Demo 2002 (Orcustus album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo 2002 (Orcustus album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:40, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Jonas Raskolnikov Christiansen

I have nominated Jonas Raskolnikov Christiansen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonas Raskolnikov Christiansen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SnottyWong ^squeal 19:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Nomination of Septem (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Septem (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Septem (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 02:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black Flame

- Black Flame (band)#Full-length albums

Hi, I merged it to here for the time being, if it sells well or charts we can give it its own article , right now imo it isn't noteworthy enough. Regards. Off2riorob (talk) 12:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Imperivm.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Imperivm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:22, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]