Jump to content

User talk:MTHarden

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Karina Quintanar (talk | contribs) at 15:56, 30 September 2011 (→Week 4&5). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Messages from Students (Fall 2011)

Mitch,

For the extra credit do we have to go to both of the events in October and along with that do a paper on the event???````Mueller86```` Mitch, are we to do Week two section 3.2 for this week?? 19:17, 29 August 2011 (UTC)(Mueller86)Mueller86 19:17, 29 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mueller86 (talk • [[Special:Contr--CreativecookEr (talk) 20:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)ibutions/Mueller86|contribs]]) [reply]

No... Well I guess. The Week 1 Assignment will be graded this Sunday (4 September), the Week 2 Assignment (which I suppose you ought be doing now) will be graded on Sunday September 11th. Make sense? --MTHarden (talk) 19:24, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Mitch, I just wanted to see if "Responsible Christian Counseling" by George G. Konrad was an article. You can find it on this site. http://www.directionjournal.org/article/?266 Thank you --CreativecookEr (talk) 20:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Week 2

I finished my quiz, with a 9/10 (which isnt great, but I didn't want to re-attempt my quiz because of time limits) I finished my the Wikipedia Week 2 Assignments, BUT I wasn't sure how to deliver the assignments to Turnitin. If you have not noticed yet, I am not tech savvy - but would like to make sure I fix this so I don't miss out on any more extra credit points! Jillian.Hind (talk) 04:00, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It does look like you did it right. You don't really have to include other class assignments like quizzes or extra credit or whatever. You even signed your comment, good job! I would say I would prefer if things were linked, and I think you should've used a level 2 heading on your calssmates talk page, but that's just minor formatting stuff. I'll fix it for you, so that you (and everyone) can see. --MTHarden (talk) 19:19, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mitch, I don't know if I did any of this wiki stuff correct and I have no idea about the Turnitin thing was I supposed to do that for the quiz? I think I'm going to have to meet with you after class or something because I really don't want to fail this class just because I don't get the wiki assignments correctly. Thanks so much. Stabers (talk) 01:30, 12 September 2011 (UTC) Sandie Tabers[reply]

I don't want you to fail either. --MTHarden (talk) 03:07, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Week 3

Hey Mr.Harden, I have been browsing through stub class articles to see of any that I'm interested in, I've found a few, but I'm a bit confused. Some of the articles I've been interested in already have posts by previous students of yours who have had ideas on how to improve them. Does this mean the article has already been improved elsewhere? Or does it just mean the student didn't ever do it and what I see is the actual article? Please and thank you for the help! --danielle*rose (talk) 03:25, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well it depends. There are many reasons a studnet might've touched an article that is still a stub class. Maybe the article wasn't improved enough, or a student critiqued it but ended up working on something else. In any event treat it just like any other Wikipedia article, if you think you can improve it (aim for a 5x expansion), and there are enough good sources out there that make you think it could be a good topic, then it is probably still fine. --MTHarden (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mitch I sent you am e-mail but not sure if it went so I'm sending you a request on here. so if its ok with you I would like to come talk to you about this wikipedia stuff on thursday or friday around 11am please let me know which is better for you. thanksStabers (talk) 00:20, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Either is fine.--MTHarden (talk) 00:22, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mitch change of my plans sorry but I will have to come on friday at 10:30. Thanks so much Stabers (talk) 00:53, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Five articles I'm interested in

1. Anxiety threshold 2. Bipolar NOS 3. Racing thoughts 4. Range anxiety 5. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tutterrow1992 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Mitch. I'm finally in line with the rest of the ducks in class, and have week one and two done but not three. I know it's due tonight, and I've been trying to figure it out since I got home and I'm just not sure what I'm doing. Olivia Miss Hurricane 2011 (talk) 02:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Finished

Mitch, you said to let you know if we finished our week 3 assignments and I did finished it today. Thank you. Have a nice day. --CreativecookEr (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did critique an article, I just didn't put it on my page. Sorry! But I just figured how to put them on my page so it's are up now. Thanks for letting me know!(Shannon Rallo (talk) 15:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed week three today.You said to message you so you would know, so i hope im doing this right. thank you :) have a nice monday --Saraheliz 19 (talk) 17:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC)saraheliz 19[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed week 3 today. I hope I did it correctly. Ahein21 (talk) 18:33, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know I have completed the assignments for this week and I am starting to understand Wikipedia. So I hope I did it in time before you enter grades. --Illinoisstate92 (talk) 21:22, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also completed week 3's assignment today! glad we added the chatroom help on here, it really helped me ! danielle*rose (talk) 23:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HI, JUST WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT I HAVE COMPLETED MY SECOND PART OF THE WEEK 3 WIKI ASSIGNMENT, HOPE ITS IN TIME FOR GRADING. --Bmat2011 (talk) 02:38, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

***I'm so sorry it's late but I was confused until today. I know it might not count for points now but my critique link is on my page! RRLukasek (talk) 03:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed my week 3 assignment tonight and I have a link to the page I critiqued under my Week 3 Assignments. --El179950 (talk) 05:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out, I did do the critique but it wasn't listed on my page, it was on formicophilia, sept 16 under my contributions.It is now listed.Nrs53 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nrs53 (talk • contribs) 09:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed my edits on Air Rage & posted what i thouhgt could be improved on the air rage Talk Page. Jamccammond (talk) 18:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i just saw your message about my missing critique for the week three assignment. I was having trouble with it, but i understand it now :) it is all completed and on my page.Meganhorn03 (talk)

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mr. Harden I think I completed my assignment. I was wondering If I could come by your office tomorrow to make sure I did everything right! --Amandafann-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amandafann (talk • contribs) 07:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mitch i just wanted to let you know that I did the assignment yesterday and I posted my comment to the article "Breaking Point", on the discussion page....please let me know if u find it ...there was a link to it on my page...thank-you--Bmat2011 (talk) 18:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr. Harden I completed the week 3 assignments but don't know if it's correct please let me know thank you. --KellyCary26 01:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

No, that's not right, I commented on your user page about what went wrong. But it's been graded. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Harden, I am struggling with the week 3 assignments i have just completed week 2 and realized i was a week behind. I am in your phy 101-02 class M$W i was wondering when would be a good time to come speak to you. your class is the last class i take. I was hoping to come see you sooner but I had to go straight to work after class on Monday. thank you (Em153328 (talk) 01:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Office hours are the best time. :) Or e-mail me with other times you might want to meet. Keep in mind you can also chat with the online ambassadors to get help here: Wikipedia classroom on IRC.--MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mitch, i did do the week 3 assignment. I just didnt get a chance to message you until now. Im sorry it was late, i had to do it on my moms computer, the pop up blocker on mine wouldnt let me do it. again, Sorry! BrandiH05 (talk) 16:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for pointing that out, I did do a critique but it waswn't listed on the page, if you went to my contributions sept 16 it was on formicophilia, nrs53 myself 09:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Week 4&5

Hey Mr. Harden! I have week 3 and week 4-5 done. I was wondering if you could check my week 4 contribution to make sure I have the right source and my sentences are okay to use. Thanks! --Annmohh (talk) 00:08, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh good. Well I took a glance at your Week 4&5 and I's like to point you to WP:BLPSPS, which suggests that using Whitfield's own website as a source of information about Whitfield is technically ok, but discouraged. Also two of the books you listed are already listed earlier in the article as well as in the bibliography section. I think the easiest way to improve this to A quality work, would be to instead use a secondary source to cite a fact about one of those books. Which was the most popular? The most influential? --MTHarden (talk) 01:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was ondering if u could check my page and see if i completed week four and five assignment correctly Ncathey17 (talk) 18:58, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so remember you can't just use "some website" as a source. Try a journal article, or a magazine or newspaper. Secondly there were a bunch of spelling and grammar errors there so I wasn't sure exactly what you were trying to say. The trouble with all the articles on specific phobias is trying to add information that is distinct from the information on Phobia. Why don't you try to do this assignment on Trichophagia you'll notice there are 4 references at the end of the article that have not yet been included int he article. So perhaps you can find one of those, read it, and add some new information. --MTHarden (talk) 04:37, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I Did the two sentences and I need to know if I cited right. Can you help me please? --Karina Quintanar (talk) 21:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I responded in the article talk --MTHarden (talk) 04:41, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I revised it, but I still do not think i'm doing it right.--Karina Quintanar (talk) 15:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MTHarden&oldid=453229429"