User talk:Gigasuperbunny

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jijeung of Silla, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jijeung of Silla was changed by Gigasuperbunny (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955352 on 2011-10-17T15:17:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:17, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jijeung of Silla with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AL_LOCKE|^talk 15:23, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jijeung of Silla with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Calabe1992 (talk) 15:28, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jijeung of Silla, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. EricSerge (talk) 18:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I think you may have me confused with someone else. Cloudbound (talk) 18:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your question on my talk page

This edit here:[1]. It had been previously removed as possible vandalism or as unconstructive three times. If you believe this statement to be true you need to cite it from a reliable source. Take a look here at citing and reliable source. Cheers. EricSerge (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I see. I was trying to figure out how to cite it. I didn't think to use the sandbox a little first and get a feel for this. Thank you!