Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schaefer Ambulance Service (3rd nomination)
AfDs for this article:
- Schaefer Ambulance Service (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable; abusive Splitjack (talk) 23:37, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
No notable distinction other than to invite criticism from a disgrunted party. Ugly. Needs to go away. They shouldn't advertise here.
- Delete This is plain company information with no distinction. Contains elements of self-promotion and advertising. Many attempts to include and delete critical POV material. Doubtful and questionable references. Astrometre (talk) 00:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Delete—fails WP:GNG. Imzadi 1979 → 01:49, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Undecided, but it's worth noting that fairly significant amounts of sourced content were removed from the article recently, some of which I've now added back in. Possible sources seem to be plentiful, but mostly behind paywalls and/or fairly brief mentions. Anybody got an LA Times subscription to check some of these out? Alzarian16 (talk) 13:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)