User talk:Racconish
Original page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Racconish |
This editor may be busy and respond slowly to queries. |
Vanity
The Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
Thank you! Codrin.B (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC) |
The Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
For rescuing the articles you wrote from speedy deletion. I dream of horses @ 17:06, 21 August 2011 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:BATTLEGROUND ARTICLE
Sorry, but with WMC's entry this Purpose article may be Wikipedia:BATTLEGROUND ARTICLE now. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 05:21, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- New proposition made on article's talk page. Cheers, Racconish Tk 08:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
?
I find this baffling. Instead of wasting time wronging rights and pointing fingers, perhaps use of new information in the latest article would improve the overall standards of wikipedia. Surely and experienced editor such as yourself would realize this. I find it absurd that you should delete my contributions, which as far as I see, have corrected and made the article more accurate. You even deleted an obvious correction of the spelling. If you genuinely have your interests set on improving the page, you should use your time to use information in the latest article and add to the page, not remove contributions by other editors, who may not have your experience, but may know more about the subject.
TY — Preceding unsigned comment added by Southpole1 (talk • contribs) 12:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- I have added 5 references to the source you provided, which does not establish The Economist was wrong in calling Chamsi-Pasha a former textile agent. Please discuss matters related to the article on the article's talk page. Racconish Tk 12:53, 25 October 2011 (UTC)