Talk:Mustafa Abdul Jalil

Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics Start‑class

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

"The Lockerbie bomber blackmailed Colonel Gadaffi... said Mustafa Abdel-Jalil"

The Lockerbie bomber blackmailed Colonel Gadaffi into securing his release from a Scottish prison by threatening to expose the dictator’s role in Britain’s worst terrorist atrocity, a former senior Libyan official has claimed. Abdelbaset al-Megrahi vowed to exact “revenge” unless he was returned home, said Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, Libya’s former justice minister. In an exclusive interview with The Sunday Times, Abdel-Jalil says Megrahi’s ploy led to a £50,000-a-month slush fund being set up to spend on legal fees and lobbying to bring him back to Tripoli. His comments are highly embarrassing for Labour, after declassified documents revealed that Gordon Brown’s government secretly worked to deliver the bomber’s freedom in exchange for trade deals. They are also likely to further strain relations between Britain and the United States, which had opposed Megrahi’s release.

The Sunday Times, 27 Feb 2011 --Mais oui! (talk) 07:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was closed as resolved.--rgpk (comment) 21:01, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mustafa Mohamed Abud Al Jeleil → Mustafa Muhammad Abd-al-Jalil — According to name on the lead and the source given (CIA). The lead paragraph says "frequently but erroneously as Abud Al Jeleil", altough there is no source for it beeing erroneous. Andreas ^(T) 14:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest renaming it to simply Mustafa Abdul-Jalil. -98.210.150.163 (talk) 00:07, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: In the meantime, User:Orionist moved to Mustafa Abdul Jalil with explanation: remove patrymonic, replace erroneous "Abud", and make it conform to Wikipedia naming standards for Arabic. Can be closed now. Andreas ^(T) 20:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mustafa-Abdul-Jalil-007.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Mustafa-Abdul-Jalil-007.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:20, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mustafa Abdul Jalil.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Mustafa Abdul Jalil.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:21, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian Nurses

There's a big difference between being 'accused of intransigence' over the Bulgarian nurses' appeal and having been the one 'who sentenced them to death'. I'm changing the unsourced line. 21:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Efforts to form an interim government during the 2011 unrest in Libya

The last part of this section does not clarify whose "personal view" it is. Is it the journalist's or is it Abdul Jalil's?