Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schaefer Ambulance Service (3rd nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable distinction other than to invite criticism from a disgrunted party. Ugly. Needs to go away. They shouldn't advertise here.

Delete This is plain company information with no distinction. Contains elements of self-promotion and advertising. Many attempts to include and delete critical POV material. Doubtful and questionable references. Astrometre (talk) 00:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC) — Astrometre (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete—fails WP:GNG. Imzadi 1979 → 01:49, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Undecided, but it's worth noting that fairly significant amounts of sourced content were removed from the article recently, some of which I've now added back in. Possible sources seem to be plentiful, but mostly behind paywalls and/or fairly brief mentions. Anybody got an LA Times subscription to check some of these out? Alzarian16 (talk) 13:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Self promotion, no distinction, bad links.Wihnoe8033 (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC) — Wihnoe8033 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Comment - I currently cannot find a Cite ... but it seems to me, they had their ambulances in the old Emergency! show. Right area, right era, this might (if cited) make them WP:Notable. Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 02:27, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable, not interesting, undeserving. Ptenski 18:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC) — Ptenski (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- WP:JNN, WP:NOTINTERESTING, WP:BELONG, do you have a deletion argument that doesn't come right out of WP:ATA? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Although notability seems to be decidedly questionable, this nomination smells, and badly, given the spate of SPAs and the fact the nominator itself is an SPA - along with the nominator's statements. "No notable distinction other than to invite criticism from a disgrunted party." Er, what? Yes, the article was attacked, but vandalism isn't a reason to delete. "Ugly"? - AfD is not for cleanup. "Needs to go away"? Why? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]