Talk:Jewish Care

lord levy is one of the most powerful men in the uk -- his links w/ jewish care and comments on the fundraising skills he honed there r obviously worthy of note. Jamaissur

Sorry, I can't understand what you're saying here. Please try English. Jayjg ^(talk) 17:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning Levy clearly constitutes poisoning the well regardless of how powerfull the man is.

or in your language: Levy Jew plague big no matter.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 09:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not quite: it's 'lvy jw plgue bg no mttr'. Jamaissur 09:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

inevitable development

sadly, people, the inevitable has happened: one of britain's most notorious far-right publications has pounced on the trivial link between patrons of jewish care and the 'cash for peerages' contretemps:

The scandal has also thrown a rare shaft of light on to the private world of Lord Levy and his web of connections with business and charities. They show that many of the Labour lenders had initially been donors to Lord Levy's favourite charities, such as the Community Service Volunteers, Jewish Care and the NSPCC. Three of the 12 who gave Labour loans -- Andrew Rosenfield, Barry Townsley and Sir David Garrard -- are also patrons of Jewish Care. The Aryan Advertiser

typical 'conspiracy theory' drivel, but all the same it's touching that three goyim should feel such concern for the british-jewish community, am i right? jamaissur ^{lemon or lime?}

That doesn't need to be mentioned on this page, unless Jewish Care itself has been involved, e.g. its offices used as meeting places or its bank accounts for transferring money. Stop your sickening campaign. JFW | T@lk 21:46, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Guardian and other british papers, read by millions of people, thought the link worth mentioning despite the absence of those factors. is that sickening? jamaissur ^{lemon or lime?}