Western alienation
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. |
It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it. This message has remained in place for seven days, so the article may be deleted without further notice. Find sources: "Western alienation" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR Nominator: Please consider notifying the author/project: {{subst:proposed deletion notify|Western alienation|concern=This is just a bunch of assertions, not a quality article and it would never be published in a respectable encyclopedia}} ~~~~ Timestamp: 20111110175505 17:55, 10 November 2011 (UTC) Administrators: delete |
In Canadian politics, Western alienation is a concept that the Western provinces - British Columbia (B.C.), Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba - have been alienated, and in extreme cases excluded, from mainstream Canadian political affairs in favour of the provinces of Ontario and Quebec. Western alienation claims that these latter two are politically represented, and economically favoured, more significantly than the former, which has given rise to the sentiment of alienation among many western Canadians. This feeling is most pronounced in B.C. and Alberta.[citation needed]
History of alienation
Following Confederation in 1867, the first Canadian Prime Minister, Sir John A. Macdonald, announced a "National Policy" to develop and unite Canada geographically and economically.[citation needed] The policy aimed to build a transcontinental railway, to settle the prairies, and to develop a manufacturing base in Eastern Canada.[citation needed]
In 1980 Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau developed the National Energy Program (NEP), which intended to use Alberta's oil revenues to subsidize gasoline prices nationwide. The program was extremely unpopular in the west, where most of Canada's oil is produced,[citation needed] and heightened distrust of the federal government, especially in Alberta, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan.[citation needed] Many Albertans believed that the NEP was an unjustified intrusion of the federal government into an area of provincial jurisdiction, designed to strip their province of its natural wealth.[citation needed] By keeping the oil prices below world market prices, the eastern provinces were essentially being subsidized.[citation needed]
Current factors of alienation
There are a number of factors that have fueled disgruntlement in Western Canada. Political factors include low political representation and the pronounced attention paid to the ongoing issue of Quebec sovereignty by the federal government. A more potent, but ambiguous claim, is that the political agenda is controlled predominantly by politicians from Eastern Canada; who focus more on the vote-rich central regions of Quebec and Ontario at the expense of western interests. Economic factors include a general redistribution of income from western provinces to eastern ones through taxation and equalization payments.
Economic factors
This article needs to be updated.(November 2010) |
Economic factors, including equalization payments and other transfer payments, have caused great discontent, especially in Alberta. In 2005, Alberta's share of equalization payments was calculated to be approximately $1.1 billion,[1] less than that provided by, but significantly higher on a per capita basis than, Ontario. Equalization payments are made by the federal government to the six current "have-not" provinces. Unlike social and health transfers, there are no restrictions over how this money is spent at the provincial level. In 2009-2010, Quebec received $8.552 billion,[2] making it the single largest beneficiary, as it has been throughout the program's history. In the 2009-2010 fiscal year, Ontario received an equalization payment of $347 million,[2] the first time in the 51 year history of the program.
British Columbia was a "have-not" province for just over five years, ending in 2006-2007, when it received $459 million.[2]
Equalization payments
2006-2007
Note: Amounts are in $ millions | Newfoundland | Prince Edward Island | Nova Scotia | New Brunswick | Quebec | Manitoba | Saskatchewan | British Columbia | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regular | 632 | 291 | 1,386 | 1,451 | 5,539 | 1,709 | 13 | 260 | 11,282 |
Adjustment* | 54 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 199 | 254 |
Total | 687 | 291 | 1,386 | 1,451 | 5,539 | 1,709 | 13 | 459 | 11,535 |
Per capita (Not in millions) | $1,334 | $2,102 | $1,475 | $1,927 | $725 | $1,445 | $13 | $107 | - |
Notes: Totals may not add up due to rounding.
* For those provinces where there is a decline from the amount they had been advised of in November 2005, a one-time adjustment will be made to offset this decline.[3]
2011-2012
The Canadian Government states that payments for the 2011-2012 period will total $14.7 billion:[4]
Note: Amounts are in $ millions | Prince Edward Island | Nova Scotia | New Brunswick | Quebec | Ontario | Manitoba |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 329 | 1,167 | 1,483 | 7,815 | 2,200 | 1,666 |
State of affairs since 2006
As of 2006[update], Western alienation does not appear to be a significant force in Canadian politics. Protests over equalization payments from former Alberta premier Ralph Klein and others objected to the formula the federal government used to determine the distribution of the payments. Klein had been quoted as threatening to drop out of the program, although this would have been a symbolic act with no legal weight since the program is funded from the federal government's general revenues.
There were also calls for the separation of at least Alberta from Canada, most notably from University of Alberta professor emeritus Leon Craig; however, such arguments were rare, while not necessarily new, and were not expected to materialize into a significant political movement in the near future.
Later decisions of the minority Conservative government of Stephen Harper – on issues such as income trusts and the recognition of the Québécois as a "nation within a united Canada" – caused some dissent amongst a segment of Western Canadians who traditionally supported the Tories. These feelings fostered only a small ripple in the Tories' popularity in Alberta, with the formation of the new federal Party of Alberta in late 2006.[5]
See also
References
- ^ Bouquets of Gray: Equalization math
- ^ a b c "Federal Support to Quebec". Department of Finance Canada. Retrieved May 14, 2011.
- ^ Canadian Department of Finance, accessed 11 August 2006
- ^ "What is Equalization?". Equalization Program. Department of Finance Canada. Retrieved 4 August 2011.
- ^ Party of Alberta web site, accessed February 12 2007