User talk:Southpole1

October 2011

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Moxon Huddersfield. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sparthorse (talk) 16:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Southpole1. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance regarding your comments on me at Talk:Moxon Huddersfield. The discussion is about the topic Southpole1. Thank you. --Racconish^Tk 18:02, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid commenting on contributors

e.g. "Blinded by arrogance" at Talk:Moxon Huddersfield. Thanks. Gerardw (talk) 18:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RSN

As the discussion on Chamsi-Pasha is not reaching a consensus, I raised the question of the reliability of the source at WP:RSN. You are welcome to contribute. Cheers, Racconish^Tk 19:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Moxon Huddersfield, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. It is particularly deceptive to mark such edit warring as minor. — Racconish^Tk 17:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You have been already warned about edit warring. Your last message on my talk page shows you have read this other warning on WP:DE. Nevertheless, you deleted again a close paraphrase of a reliable source on which consensus had been built. I give you 24 hours to revert your last "minor" change, after which I will raise the matter at WP:ANI. Thank you, — Racconish^Tk 18:40, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]