Talk:Anonymous function
Computing Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Computer science Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||
|
Typical usage summary?
The article might be more comprehensible if it introduced anonymous functions as *parameters* to named function. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.114.83 (talk) 22:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Full vs. Some support?
I wasn't sure what the difference was between "Full" and "Some" support. Added Perl as having "Full" support, since it can do the five examples: sort, map, grep, curry, reduce ('reduce' is in List::Util). And, it has fully anonymous functions. Benizi (talk) 00:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Expert tag and merge discussion
See Talk:First-class_function#Merge_anonymous_function_here. Pcap ping 21:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Section 3.14 Python
Ha! Unexpected humor! Πthon is section 3.14.
Sorry, I can't help myself. Unimath (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Ubiquitous in languages with first-class functions... such as Haskell?
This sentence in the introduction struck me as odd:
- Anonymous functions are convenient to pass as an argument to a higher-order function and are ubiquitous in languages with first-class functions such as Haskell. [emphasis mine]
Why is Haskell used as an example of a language where anonymous functions are convenient–or better yet—why is there an example language at all? Anonymous functions aren't unique to Haskell are there are other more (historically) notable programming languages that use them. —BiT (talk) 02:20, 22 November 2011 (UTC)