User talk:Jabbsworth

Please note that I used to have another WP account and my actual edit count is 12,000+. Please don't template me; I am not a newbie.

This is Jabbsworth's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Stevia

Please stop for a moment. You have introduced some errors, including unsourced commentary and broken links, into the stevia article that need cleaning up. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:14, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article is FULL of outdated information and errors, as well as anti-stevia spin. I'll stop when you show me my errors. Jabbsworth 23:18, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article is also full of relevant history -- including out-of-date studies and anti-stevia spin that were influential in the United States and other countries banning the sweetener. For the most part I have restored your edits after some corrections. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:43, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

self promotion

Please stop linking to your own external opinionated writings that are hosted at sources that are not WP:RS. Off2riorob (talk) 15:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hipocrite (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Topic-banned

You were warned against making unfounded allegations of paid pro-aspartame editing back when you were still editing as TickleMeister (talk · contribs) [1]. You have now clearly resumed the same disruptive pattern again [2][3].

You are therefore now indefinitely topic-banned from all edits relating to Aspartame, under the discretionary sanctions rule of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. This goes for all edits and comments in all namespaces. Fut.Perf. ☼ 00:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. I would never have been able to insert any negative data, no matter what the sources, there anyway. Jabbsworth 00:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's bull. I WELCOME negative info on Aspartame as long as it's properly sourced and weighted. -- Brangifer (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Go through the SourceWatch page and extract the cited data you think should be added to Aspartame controversy. You talk the talk, but will you walk the walk? Jabbsworth 00:54, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]