Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timemesh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Courcelles (talk | contribs) at 21:28, 21 December 2011 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:28, 21 December 2011 by Courcelles (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 21:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Timemesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find video game sources: "Timemesh" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
Google search returns nothing outside of its official website and found no secondary news sources. Although funded by European Commission, notability is not inherited and this appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:WEB Vanadus (talk | contribs) 09:36, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Ghits just seem to be primary sources, social media, and WP and its mirrors, in several European languages. Fails WP:N. If better sourcing can be found, happy to reevaluate. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 22:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.