Template:You've got mail/doc

Purpose

Tired of sending a user an email and posting a message on their talk page to tell them you've sent them an email? If you are, then use this template to notify email recipients instead.

The template does not require substitution.

Usage

Any of the following:

Input	Result	Note
{{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}}	Hello. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
{{You've got mail|sig=~~~~}} or {{YGM|sig=~~~~}}	Hello. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— ~~~~	~~~~ will be replaced by your actual signature and timestamp.
{{You've got mail|dashlesssig=~~~~}} or {{YGM|dashlesssig=~~~~}}	Hello. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. ~~~~	~~~~ will be replaced by your actual signature and timestamp (for those who already have dashes or other separators in their custom sigs).
{{You've got mail|ts=~~~~~}} or {{YGM|ts=~~~~~}}	Hello. Please check your email; you've got mail! Message added ~~~~~. It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.	~~~~~ will be replaced by your actual timestamp.
{{You've got mail|tweet=yes}} or {{YGM|tweet=yes}}	Hello. Check your Twitter; you've got a tweet! You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.	The other signature options can be used as well.

See also

• {{Talkback}}

Thank you for reviewing my article. in your review, you say "We're sorry, but we cannot accept insourced articles, or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please cite reliable, third-party sources in the article. Third-party sources are needed so the information can be verified, and so the notability of the topic can be established."

I am sure you can see that the 3 of the external references listed are published by "RELIABLE THIRD PART REFERENCE". The fourth reference is the simply the web site that provides more details about the subject. If you want us to remove it, that is fine. Also Reference number 4 under "References" is published by, SD Times, a very reputable third part source. If you want us to remove the other 3 references, we can do that. There are hundreds of articles out there on Wikipedia that that does not have one single reference from external verifiable source; only the company web site. See the article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BuildMaster for example. I can find too many of these for you if you want. I am just following the same criteria that our competitor followed and then article was accepted. I certainly do not want our article to be treated differently or evaluated based on a different criteria. If our article is not accepted, then all these articles need to be deleted. Please advise what you are looking for instead of copying general text from Wikipedia pages. Thank you.