Jump to content

Talk:EDP Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 99.19.46.105 (talk) at 11:13, 28 December 2011 (WP:ALL CAPS). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPortugal Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

  • Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
  • Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

Assess

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

WikiProject iconCompanies Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconEnergy Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo EDP.JPG

Image:Logo EDP.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone made a messy job here: "and it is also present in the electricity sectors of Latin America – with a major presence in the US, Brazil, Africa and Macau, in the generation, distribution and trading businesses." The article quotes latin america and then proceeds to name the US , Brasil and even continents (africa). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.250.69.210 (talk) 18:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • China Gets Stake in Portugal's EDP by Patricia Kowsmann and Wayne Ma December 23, 2011, excerpt ...

    Portugal's government said on Thursday that China Three Gorges Corp. won the bidding for its 21% stake in EDP-Energias de Portugal SA with an offer of 2.69 billion ($3.51 billion), in the first of a series of sales of state-owned assets under its austerity program. The deal marks the first time a mainland Chinese firm acquired a significant stake in a southern European company and may portend other such moves as cash-strapped European governments from Madrid to Athens have been clamoring for Chinese funding to help them finance gaping budget deficits.

  • China Three Gorges Claims Edge in Bidding for Stake December 19, 2011, 9:54 A.M. ET by Wayne Ma reporting from Beijing, excerpt ...

    China Three Gorges Corp. said Monday that it has a slight edge in bidding for the Portuguese government's sale of a 21% stake in Energias de Portugal SA, and that it hoped the winning bid would be based on commercial rather than political considerations. Three Gorges said in a written statement that Portuguese media have questioned whether the stake sale to a Chinese company would pose a threat to Portugal's economy. China's Ministry of Commerce has publicly expressed a desire for Portugal to uphold market principles and treat bids openly, fairly and transparently, Three Gorges added. ...

99.190.85.17 (talk) 07:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/Beagel states in Edit Summary comments "already in article". 99.181.143.108 (talk) 04:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]