Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 January 1

Link for actor is currently a redirect to A.N.T. Farm. Requesting that the actor have his own entry, I worked on it in my own userspace: User:QuasyBoy/Carlon Jeffery. Actor has a regular role in the A.N.T. Farm series, which was recently renewed for a second season. Other than A.N.T. Farm, he appeared in three episodes of Heroes. I figured, I would take this to deletion review, seeing that the decision on Sierra McCormick (Jeffery's A.N.T. Farm co-star) was overturned: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 December 19. QuasyBoy 23:15, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A clear consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlon Jeffery in July found that he failed WP:ENT (one significant role, needs two) and was not the subject of substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. There is no indication that anything of substance to this discussion has changed since then. Article X, Sierra McCormick, has considerably more coverage, considerably more roles and appears to pass WP:ENT. - SummerPhD (talk) 23:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How does the actor having a three episode stint on a show (Heroes) that at one time was one of the most popular shows in the country and has currently has a regular role on another show (A.N.T. Farm), which just renewed for second season not pass WP:ENTERTAINER. It seems you only nominated the subject based on WP:TOOSOON, which maybe I under stand because the first attempt for an article on the subject was shortly after the show premiered. Prior to A.N.T. Farm, I would say the subject shouldn't have an article, but this is clearly not the case now. As for "independent reliable sources", they be added through regular editing. Deletion doesn't need to the answer for everything. QuasyBoy 23:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Akers

I found book coverage - [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and [6]. The deleting admin hasn't edited since August. SL93 (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing stopping you from creating a new article with these sources, or from adding them to the old article (which has been moved to project space here). Provided the article has some sort of evidence of notability beyond that considered at the AfD then it won't be speedily deleted. Hut 8.5 20:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright. I will add them to the incubated article and fix the article up. SL93 (talk) 20:44, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I added the five sources (one of the above is a repeat) and moved the article to mainspace. There is more book coverage, but I think that should do. SL93 (talk) 21:51, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]