Jump to content

Talk:Raw Story

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by QLineOrientalist (talk | contribs) at 03:24, 13 January 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Founder(s)?

Is there a founder of TRS? Is there an editor-in-chief? QLineOrientalist (talk) 03:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Highly credible and well-sourced? I'm not trolling, I'd feel better with some evidence to back that up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HiS oWn (talk • contribs)

i agree with you. should that statement be removed? User:Anthonymendoza12.203.178.107 13:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moderate-progressive

"Moderate-progressive?", based on the 'journalists' associated with this group, they're definately not moderate. Progressive is a nice squishy label. Removing "moderate". Kyaa the Catlord 12:10, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

Someone needs to put some critisims of this site on this page. The site is a partisan hack job. This page needs to reflect that, especially since all of their "investigations" about the "Plame leak" were disproven. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.248.9.162 (talk • contribs)


Gee, numbnuts, maybe you should add the sourced criticisms yourself. It's wiki-friggin-pedia. a n y o n e can add. 24.147.229.211 06:07, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disproven? Here's a hint, by just saying that, twisting reality, doesn't make it so. Stewiegfan 22:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Broken stories"

How would we go about verifying this section? Is there any way of knowing retrospectively who first broke a story? Are sources possible? Can we think of a better section title? ("Scoops"?)-Will Beback · † · 10:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I dont think there needs to be this section. Is there a broken stories section on the BBC page? Its irrelevant and not verifiable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.176.213.114 (talk) 19:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First sentence

First sentence seems to be sourced to an aside made by Howard Kurtz in a rush transcription of a conversation aired in 2005, where he refers to it as "liberal blog RawStory" [sic] http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/12/rs.01.html Suggest not reliable or NPOV summary, the website's own claim is that it's a "progressive news site that focuses on stories often ignored in the mainstream media." Eversense (talk) 03:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Raw_Story&oldid=471079122"