Talk:Pennsylvania Railroad 4876

Pennsylvania Railroad 4876 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 24, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Trains: Locomotives GA‑class Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 19, 2011

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

GA

This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Disaster management GA‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:PRR 4876/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 15:37, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
There were some very minor punctuation and other language issues, but I have fixed them. Aside from those, the article is well written and complies to WP:MOS requirements.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Article is properly referenced with reliable sources and has no original research.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Article covers major aspects and is focused.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Article complies to WP:NPOV.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Article is stable.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Pictures are properly tagged and has a suitable caption.
Overall: This is a short but concise article on the subject, well researched and written. I am confident that it meets all the requirements for a GA, and am happy to pass it. Well done. – SMasters (talk) 16:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pass/Fail:

Smithsonian

In the article titled 'Of GG1's, NJ Transit, Boeing 707's, and the media', author Don Wood said she was slated for the Smithsonian (Ultimately, of course, the 4876 ultimately never made it theren). This appeared on page 66 in the August 1984 issue of Trains Magazine, published by Kalmbach Publishing. Not sure how the whole Wikipedia reference thing works with the appropriate codes and such, so hopefully someone will toss in the appropriate reference for me since it's an interesting facet of her history that she nearly made it to the most important museum in this country (As did an example of the Alco PA, which also didn't quite make it there).