User talk:Brutaldeluxe
| Please leave a . |
| This is Brutaldeluxe's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Note that comments by banned users, problem users and sock puppets are
struck. Inanities, aberrations, absurdities, craziness, deliriums, delusions, derangement, distractions, follies, frenzies, hallucinations, hysterias, illusions, irrationality, lunacy, mania, preposterousness, psychopathy, senselessness, unreasonableness and witlessness may go unanswered.
Please comment on Talk:Serer people
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Serer people. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 10:17, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Continuation War
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Continuation War. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Katrina Kaif
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Katrina Kaif. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 12:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Veterans Day
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Veterans Day. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 14:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Season's tidings!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:30, 25 December 2011 (UTC).
Season's Greetings
|
May you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year | |
| It's the festive time of the year, and I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! If you do not celebrate Christmas, may it be a peaceful time for you, and may the New Year bring you new hopes and good luck. Season's Greetings --&レア (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)|} |
We may not have spoken for a long time, however, I felt this may have been the opportunity to pass by and wish you a season's greetings.
Please comment on Talk:Azad Kashmir
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Azad Kashmir. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Can you please include a quote you are referencing in Yates book? This makes the offline ref more transparent.842U (talk) 13:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm really not sure what you are referring to. Coordinates of place locations should not be so prominent in the main body of a biographical article, BTW. The mayor of Yurp (talk) 13:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- My question was a misunderstanding on my part; I thought you had added what turns out to be a ref that was already in the article. Sorry. BTW, do you have a reference for this: "Coordinates of place locations should not be so prominent in the main body of a biographical article." Is this your opinion or a Wikipedia guideline?842U (talk) 23:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Seems like common sense. Doing things the way they are normally done = sticking to consensus. If the article was about the chateau then it would be OK to include coordinates, but then they should go in the infobox anyway. The mayor of Yurp (talk) 01:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Bit of a circular argument: Coordinates should not go in the main body of a biographical article. Why. Because it seems like common sense. 842U (talk) 04:17, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Seems like common sense. Doing things the way they are normally done = sticking to consensus. If the article was about the chateau then it would be OK to include coordinates, but then they should go in the infobox anyway. The mayor of Yurp (talk) 01:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- My question was a misunderstanding on my part; I thought you had added what turns out to be a ref that was already in the article. Sorry. BTW, do you have a reference for this: "Coordinates of place locations should not be so prominent in the main body of a biographical article." Is this your opinion or a Wikipedia guideline?842U (talk) 23:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Italy Biodiversity
Hello Brutaldeluxe I am thinking of reinstating (modified) the paragraph on biodiversity in Italy on that articles main page (see past discussion here [1].This would be in line with the Italian language page "Italia" and perhaps a translation of that part.And with no see alsos or that uninformative photo. I'll put it on my sandbox first and welcome any comment or suggestions. What do you think? All the best for the New Year Notafly (talk) 11:53, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Adding a biodiversity section would be fine. If you could give me a link to your sandbox I'll help you write it, but bear in mind that I'll be back at work next week so I won't have access to a computer until the weekends. BTW, the section on the Italian article includes a glaring mistake: coppicing (ceduazione) is not a harmful practice, it is rather a beneficial practice that artificially provides an ecotone which simulates the benefits of natural succession. Thank you for valuing my opinion and felice anno nuovo. The mayor of Yurp (talk) 23:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Taliban
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Taliban. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
In the part about Montenegro in YU role of 90's there is information about crimes against refugees, but it is not clear where these refugees come from? It would be fair to say that Montenegro accepted hundreds of thousnands of refugees from Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo of all ethnic and religious groups. Only after that one could explain about certain crimes against refugees.