Jump to content

User talk:Walter55000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Walter55000 (talk | contribs) at 22:38, 18 February 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nolelover Talk·Contribs 01:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A412 (Talk * C) 01:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A412 (Talk * C) 01:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bmusician 03:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sumitkumarjha75 (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phineas and ferb (season 4)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Phineas and ferb (season 4), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Themself (talk) 19:26, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Themself (talk) 19:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phineas and ferb (season 4)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Phineas and ferb (season 4), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Luke (Talk) 20:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phineas and ferb (season 5)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Phineas and ferb (season 5) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Στc. 20:25, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phineas and ferb (season 6)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Phineas and ferb (season 6) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Στc. 20:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you briefly, specifically for the above three titles but in general for the pointlessness of most of your edits. We do not need AfC categories created months in advance for example. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 00:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 00:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Block rationale clarification

Adding to RHaworth (talk · contribs)'s block against your account for 48 hours due to your obnoxious behavior, including submitting vandalism Articles for Creation submissions, and creating inappropriate pages, I am warning you, although I am not an admin, that if you continue behaving obnoxiously like this, your next ban will be longer or even permanent. If you feel this block has been placed against your account in error, feel free to appeal the block using {{unblock}}. Thank you. --Bmusician 04:11, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/george lopez (season 1)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/george lopez (season 1), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bmusician 04:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

If you continue to use this talk page for adding gibberish and wasting our time, then your talk page access will be revoked. --Bmusician 04:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing against blocking the user indefinitely as a trolling/vandalism only account becuase xe seems only to be here for that very purpose. --Bmusician 14:52, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

If all you are doing after the block is to game the system, as you did to The Fairly OddParents (season 8), you may be blocked again. --Bmusician 02:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Fumitol|talk|cont 17:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/istillpsycho (icarly ep.90-91)

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/istillpsycho (icarly ep.90-91), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copied from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICarly_(season_5)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kinkreet (talk) 02:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of iCarly episodes, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kevinbrogers (talk) 21:40, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of iCarly episodes. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I reverted your addition because the website you've cited is a fan page, which fails WP:RELIABLE. Kevinbrogers (talk) 22:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article List of iCarly episodes has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 03:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two consecutive, different edits with identical edit summaries, neither of which is correct, indicate that you are copying and pasting edit summaries.[1][2] Edit summaries should accurately describe the edit that you have made. Given the number of edits that you have been making at List of iCarly episodes tat have been reverted by others, you should always use an edit summary. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of iCarly episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fan sites are not reliable sources and can not be used as references. The content that you have restored includes inappropriate removal of content, addition of unsourced dates and content sourced to a fan site. As such, nothing in your latest edit constitutes a valid edit and has been treated as vandalism, since you have been warned numerous times. AussieLegend (talk) 03:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, if you have a problem with your edits being reverted by multiple editors, you need to discuss them on the article's talk page, and not simply revert the reversions. The reversions you are making at List of iCarly episodes constitute edit warring and may result in you being blocked again. Based on your edits today, it appears that you are very close to, or may even have already breached the three-revert rule, which s a bright-line rule that we take very seriously. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of iCarly episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. AussieLegend (talk) 03:46, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ICarly (season 5), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 13:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/phineas and ferb (season 4)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/phineas and ferb (season 4), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bmusician 14:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

Please note, you have been reported for edit-warring at List of iCarly episodes. The report is here. --AussieLegend (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Template:Z10 Kuru (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

comment

well i know that im blocked again and i just needed some help from anyone out there for beginning stuff like how to send messsages.walter55000 22:38, 18 feburary 2012

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Walter55000&oldid=477616312"