User talk:Kuguar03
Appearance
Big thumbs up on your recent edits to Prostitution; I'm glad I'm not the only one working on improving it ;-) MsBatfish (talk) 11:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1994 San Marino GP
Not sure why you added hidden comments attempting to stop editors from changing the classifications when your version was not only wrong, but contrary to the source plainly given below. The source says "accident" (fatal isn't entirely necessary) for Senna and nothing at all for Ratzenberger. It's a poor source anyway, given the legendary inaccuracies of F1.com; however other decent sources also show "accident" for Senna. Bretonbanquet (talk) 18:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Since "my version" is the one that fits what you're describing, I'm not sure what your point is. And editors do keep changing the classifications, so the comments are necessary. I suggest you look at the edit history and what my edits actually were before making bizarre accusations. Kuguar03 (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Look at the edit history? OK, what's this? [1] That's you changing it to "collision" and claiming "this the official classification", which as we can see, it isn't. Did you or did you not change the classification to an incorrect one and claim it was correct, and then add a note for other editors to leave it like that, i.e. wrong? If you don't like messages like the one above, then don't use misleading edit summaries and then claim that your edits are fine. Bretonbanquet (talk) 01:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Again, look at the edit history. What you're saying isn't accurate. "My version" is the same as "your version". I'm opposed to using such term, instead preferring to work with editors towards a common goal, but if you insist on viewing it in such terms, so be it. Kuguar03 (talk) 23:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Look at the edit history? OK, what's this? [1] That's you changing it to "collision" and claiming "this the official classification", which as we can see, it isn't. Did you or did you not change the classification to an incorrect one and claim it was correct, and then add a note for other editors to leave it like that, i.e. wrong? If you don't like messages like the one above, then don't use misleading edit summaries and then claim that your edits are fine. Bretonbanquet (talk) 01:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)