Talk:Ethnomedicine

is that bit about dogs and grass really necessary on an ethnomedicine page? isn't that really just a mention of animal forms of medicine? actually, on second glance, that whole last sentence is unnecessary and is treating "ethnomedicine" as a simple synonym for "medicine" in its practiced form. ill remove it. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Crazyfatcat:

You are totally wrong with your judgement. The protagonist of the film is a Dr. in neurology and psychiatry who converted to Shamanismis because he is convinced, that the southamerican shamanistic way of healing is much better than western schoolmedicine.

The film shows how to make Ajahuasca and describes the principals af the shamanistic way of healing. On a very high level and very competent. The protagonist of the film is the only shaman who can do it on this level at the moment. For Alan Shoemaker he his the most spiritual Healer at this days.

The film was shown on Festival Psy, specialized on showing new films about mental illness and ways of curing. Also the Filmfestival "Tage des Ethnologischen Films" specialized on ethnology films screende the film very sucessful about three times, because it´s a new sight on the subject, taking Ethnomedizine very serios.

It´s definitly NOT a film just about dogs and grass.

Please remove the film. And if you don´t belive me, just watch the film and make a decision afterwards.

regards, Crazyfatcat — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.97.240.9 (talk) 11:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC)