Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ProfessorJane

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bunser (talk | contribs) at 01:06, 17 March 2012 (Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=no <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above t...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

– This SPI case is open.

114.229.254.215

Please note that a case was originally opened under ProfessorJane (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/114.229.254.215. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/114.229.254.215.


17 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


The ip addresses were involved in voting regarding a page move on the Talk:Republic of China article.

114.229.254.215 and 114.229.158.96 both start out their editing with a support vote in favor of the move, the second showed up one day after the first. they never made any previous edits to wiki, they both have the same initial six digits, and after I traced both of their ip addresses on http://www.ip-adress.com, both of them use exactly the same isp "Chinanet Jiangsu Province Network", and both trace back to beijing. They share together five edits to this talk page, and the second ip made two minor edits to other articles right after they voted.

If I read the rules and other cases correctly, I don't think ips can be indeffed, these ips need a temporary block and a warning for socking, and since they were WP:SPA's anyway, there vote doesn't count.Bunser (talk) 01:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC) Bunser (talk) 01:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments