User talk:Eraserhead1
Haha, Eraserhead, you got burned by m0rphzone. lolololol! -a random guest, browsing user pages. Oh here take this!
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely because its owner is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets) |
and this!
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered boring. Please take it seriously. |
|
| This is Eraserhead1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 20 days  |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
AN/I mention
Our Republic of China IP has mentioned you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive742#User:HiLo48. Nothing important though, but I thought notification would be appropriate for the sake of notification. CMD (talk) 01:31, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yay! -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 10:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
I think the Rfc is nearly finalized, but only a few editors have commented recently, not including you. Could you take a look & let us know what you think at Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/11_February_2012/Muhammad-images#Finalizing_Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment.2FMuhammad_images. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 14:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've replied. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 15:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Apple media events
Hello, I see you have listed yourself as a participant at Wikiproject Computing Assessment, as being interested in evaluating computing-related articles. There is a discussion right now at Talk:Apple media events about the article Apple media events. The questions are: 1) Does the article Apple media events fall under Wikiproject Computing; and if so, 2) What Importance (Top, High, Mid, Low) should it be assigned? Your participation is appreciated! Thanks... Zad68 (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Republic of China
Can you please stop reverting at Talk:Republic of China. The idea is for no one to change the closed section. If there is a problem you can talk to one of us closing admins, but as it stands now we will have to check the history to see what revision it was when the discussion closed. And now page is locked against editing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
User talk:Graeme Bartlett
User talk:Graeme Bartlett asked me to stop reverting Talk:Republic of China just so you know: see: My talk. Cheers and good night! Jim1138 (talk) 11:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- I've seen that and replied. Good night. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 11:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
I have checked the state of the talk page now, only one real comment was added late, the rest of the changes were moving text around, or auto-signs. I have removed the late comment and relocated the section that I included in the close that was on another topic. This seems to be what half the edit war was about. Materialscientist has now offered to block any editors of the closed section. If the four of you involved in the edit war agree to stop altering the closed section I will unlock the talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'd rather keep the talk page protected to be perfectly honest, I really don't see the value in trying to reply to points in the discussion after it has finished (or to reply to those points and so on). -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 12:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- If editing in the closed section continues by the non-admins for any reason I will move it all to a protected page. People can keep talking outside but you are right it is pointless. The talk page as a whole should not stay protected, as there must be a place to talk. The page is now unlocked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)