Jump to content

User talk:204.185.204.253

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ESkog (talk | contribs) at 16:02, 19 April 2012 (Level 2 warning re. Sara Teasdale (HG)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

November 2008

re: your edits to Jack London.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 16:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Jack London constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. George The Dragon (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jack London. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. George The Dragon (talk) 17:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jack London. George The Dragon (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoygabsadds 17:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Résumé has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 15:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Screw (simple machine)‎ page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rossami (talk) 14:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Nigerian Fourth Republic. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. DA Skunk - (talk) 15:56, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated vandalism after warnings. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.  JGHowes  talk 19:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pallas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 17:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Diplomats has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ♪TempoDiValse♪ 15:31, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Diplomats constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ♪TempoDiValse♪ 15:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Diplomats. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ♪TempoDiValse♪ 15:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Diplomats. Marek.69 talk 15:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Your recent edit to the page Juelz Santana appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you may do and take a look at the welcome page, if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. DiverseMentality 19:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Steam engine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 19:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Juelz Santana, you will be blocked from editing. Old Moonraker (talk) 19:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Yahoo! Answers. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Novangelis (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tennessee Valley Authority, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tennessee Valley Authority was changed by 204.185.204.253 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-02-19T13:44:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to New Mexico. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Doulos Christos ♥ talk  19:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Denzel Washington. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 20:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Talk:Black panther has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 19:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Boa constrictor has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Versus22 talk 16:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Giant anaconda. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Versus22 talk 16:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rita Dove, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rita Dove was changed by 204.185.204.253 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-23T14:46:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use your talk page for non-Wikipedia related discussion or to disparage others – this is not what a user talk page is for, see WP:UP#NOT.  JGHowes  talk 16:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to N. Scott Momaday, you will be blocked from editing.  JGHowes  talk 19:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tip. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 17:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peregrine Falcon, you will be blocked from editing. — Aldaron • T/C 15:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

June 2009

You have been blocked for a period of 2 months from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Mifter (talk) 16:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Engineering has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. 0x6D667061 (talk) 19:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Microwave oven. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Microwave oven was changed by 204.185.204.253 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-19T17:47:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Microwave oven, you will be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 17:48, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Microwave oven. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 17:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

NawlinWiki (talk) 17:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Miranda v. Arizona, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Iohannes Animosus (talk) 14:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Talk:Joe Baca. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. Zhang He (talk) 17:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to San Miguel de Allende, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page San Miguel de Allende. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jusdafax 15:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:The Holocaust, you will be blocked from editing. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 19:22, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Talk:The Holocaust. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 19:33, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 year from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 19:22, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning before next block

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:51, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Vandalism. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Catfish Jim & the soapdish 16:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Gods Must Be Crazy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 14:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Constitutional republic, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--armoreno10 19:18, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ludacris, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fat-Tone, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

October 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page History of measurement worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Japanese nuclear weapon program with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Raiden (Mortal Kombat) with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 15:50, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nixon goes to China with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Tgeairn (talk) 15:58, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Iran and weapons of mass destruction, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iran and weapons of mass destruction with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Socialservice (talk) 16:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Lewis (U.S. politician) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wes Moore, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Eddie Guerrero. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Calabe1992 20:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Du Pre Alexander, 2nd Earl of Caledon, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Monarchies in Europe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Monarchies in Europe with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Guinea, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Guinea was changed by 204.185.204.253 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.981871 on 2012-02-27T20:02:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Guinea with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 20:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at File:Polo Ralph Lauren logo.png, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. NTox · talk 15:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Seated Woman of Çatalhöyük, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Native American civil rights with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 18:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Native American civil rights with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 18:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Native American civil rights with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Nick Wilson (talk) 18:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 was changed by 204.185.204.253 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943318 on 2012-03-27T18:54:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Beats Electronics. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Davewild (talk) 19:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sara Teasdale, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sara Teasdale with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:204.185.204.253&oldid=488188255"